Logo

Nathalie Peregrine's Personal Meeting Room - Shared screen with speaker view
Steve DelBianco
35:34
I think Zoom is better than Adobe for other features, too. Not just the cool name!
David McAuley
35:57
not here
Ariel Liang
36:16
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yeydtqli8UWOrrvChIf9EMprGxo0pOr5lcadM-n0PnY/edit
David McAuley
37:02
Thanks Ariel
Ariel Liang
37:09
No problem David
Maxim Alzoba
38:05
thanks
Ariel Liang
39:39
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uNXALBljWRf6rJcOqSCLoOo_4Axe188Mp5JWxnfb_lI/edit#heading=h.1t3h5sf
Maxim Alzoba
40:28
I see it
David McAuley
40:29
i see it
Steve DelBianco
40:49
Virginia Tech?
Steve DelBianco
41:00
VACATION!
julie.hedlund
41:55
And Steve’s comments were accepted
David McAuley
42:30
down to 4.3
julie.hedlund
43:46
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uNXALBljWRf6rJcOqSCLoOo_4Axe188Mp5JWxnfb_lI/edit?usp=sharing
David McAuley
44:09
yes
Heather Forrest
46:50
that's a very fair point, David
julie.hedlund
47:18
hand up
Maxim Alzoba
47:30
there is always current bylaws , even after the change … so I am puzzled a bit
julie.hedlund
47:31
(from staff)
David McAuley
47:52
ok - that probably takes care of the issue Julie
Heather Forrest
48:10
True, guidelines changes don't need much formality. Then again, it may be difficult at the time for Council to remember all that needs to be changed
Maxim Alzoba
48:38
ehh.. is ‘this can not contradict bylaws’ not enough?
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
49:01
Bylaws are not being changed without exploring the implications to any process.
julie.hedlund
49:22
Staff can track Bylaws changes and implications
julie.hedlund
49:29
We would in any case :-)
David McAuley
49:47
yes, happy with that
julie.hedlund
50:01
Oh, and Bylaws changes have to be approved by the Empowered Community
julie.hedlund
51:16
Not me :-)
julie.hedlund
51:35
That’s the language from the GIP
julie.hedlund
52:51
We’ll take the action to produce a clean version — should also go out to the list to ensure there are no changes from those not on this call?
David McAuley
52:58
wonderful, moving on
Ariel Liang
53:27
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ol8461abkOqzXSahZKkuLL-7GxDWklmA0wnK1CKwfgY/edit#heading=h.1t3h5sf
Heather Forrest
54:32
Steve - now you're anonymous chinchilla?
Steve DelBianco
57:53
Now I’m iguana. Don’t really understand why, since I am signed in to my Google account
David McAuley
58:57
Thanks Heather
Heather Forrest
59:19
go right ahead!
Heather Forrest
59:44
We went through the document at a high level in the last call
Heather Forrest
01:00:00
@David - can you point us to spots where you think the ccNSO might have concerns?
Heather Forrest
01:01:41
so we need to replace 'or' with 'and' here
Heather Forrest
01:01:57
thanks Ariel
Maxim Alzoba
01:02:07
I think I lost the main zoom window after minimizing it … see the google doc and chat window
Heather Forrest
01:02:40
Excellent,Steve
David McAuley
01:02:46
nice
Heather Forrest
01:03:20
@David - old hand or new hand?
David McAuley
01:04:18
Heather - I don't think there are major ccNSO concerns - just a thought that we need to touch base jointly as I recall
Maxim Alzoba
01:05:46
transparency might not be questioned here
Maxim Alzoba
01:06:00
but, if it is a decision of ccNSO - then it is fine
julie.hedlund
01:08:08
hand up
Heather Forrest
01:09:05
GIP has been produced but now ccNSO and GNSO are consulting?
Heather Forrest
01:09:21
That's what I understand -might be doing a crummy job of articulating that
Heather Forrest
01:10:00
This will likely to refer back to the GIP outcome for GNSO and whatever the ccNSO produces, I'm thinking.
Heather Forrest
01:10:22
@Steve - wouldn't Council simply refer to the outcome of its GIP?
Heather Forrest
01:12:13
I think that the paragraph on GIP output gives Council significant flexibility as to what it makes explicit.
Maxim Alzoba
01:13:17
for engineers is might be simple (to find out which particular user has the patters of issues)
David McAuley
01:14:43
Thanks Steve
David McAuley
01:15:42
comment on 5.7
Heather Forrest
01:16:24
Good catch, Steve
Heather Forrest
01:16:45
The language in the Bylaws is 'request'
Heather Forrest
01:17:07
Hooray Anonymous Iguana
Heather Forrest
01:17:20
ICANN Org, no?
David McAuley
01:18:57
OK - and 18.12 (d) mentions GNSO Council
David McAuley
01:20:06
Thanks for work on this doc
Heather Forrest
01:20:42
I would LOVE to leave the Bylaws alone
Steve DelBianco
01:21:19
it was a LOT more painful for me, Heather!
julie.hedlund
01:21:41
hand up
Heather Forrest
01:23:02
Very helpful, David, thanks
Ariel Liang
01:24:01
:D
Heather Forrest
01:24:10
Eagle Eyes Ariel
David McAuley
01:24:40
yes
Ariel Liang
01:24:41
No problem!
David McAuley
01:25:16
absolutely, thanks to Julie and Ariel
Steve DelBianco
01:26:11
Is there anyone in ccNSO who is keenly interested in this?
David McAuley
01:26:34
good point Heather
julie.hedlund
01:26:51
@David: We can capture it for you as a Word document with redline/comments if that’s more useful to you — but also can include a link to the Google doc.
David McAuley
01:27:44
thanks Julie that will be helpful
julie.hedlund
01:27:44
Not everyone can use Google doc.
julie.hedlund
01:27:48
Captured as an action.
Steve DelBianco
01:27:59
Give readers a choice of Word or Google Doc, please. Send both
julie.hedlund
01:28:02
Will have it for David tomorrow.
Steve DelBianco
01:28:08
that is, a DOC and a link to Google
julie.hedlund
01:28:11
Can do that to Steve.
David McAuley
01:28:11
I don't mind - it's a natural on that
David McAuley
01:28:15
with GRC
julie.hedlund
01:28:15
too Steve
David McAuley
01:28:17
will do
julie.hedlund
01:29:05
Will do Heather
David McAuley
01:29:14
none here
Juan Manuel Rojas
01:30:19
Thanks everyone!
julie.hedlund
01:30:20
Nothing here
David McAuley
01:30:27
I will be ther ermotely - real coffee inkitchen
Ariel Liang
01:30:29
Thanks everyone!
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
01:30:36
bye all!
Juan Manuel Rojas
01:30:40
Bye all