Logo

Michelle DeSmyter's Personal Meeting Room - Shared screen with speaker view
Sue Schuler
30:56
Welcome to the meeting of the RDAP WG. Please announce your name before speaking for purposes of the transcript. Please mute your microphone when not speaking to help maintain sound quality. thanks
Sarah Wyld
35:45
That's no excuse!
Jothan Frakes
40:59
I submitted IANA670 just as we finished our call yesterday and didnt see it in the iana file as of yesterday
Jothan Frakes
41:42
am somewhere with too much bg noise to talk on call but wanted to update group
Jothan Frakes
44:46
I dont speak for all registrars, just my own. sharing the experience from a smaller registrar.
Karla Hakansson
47:58
Hi Jothan - I can tell you why it isn’t showing up on IANA if you want to take it offline
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
50:15
Registry base URL is only updated in IANA… correct
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
50:20
not in the NSp
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
50:29
it’s a “normal” IANA update
Sue Schuler
52:52
http://regiops.net/?page_id=117
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
53:08
good find Sue
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
53:48
here is the link to the exact PDF:
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
53:51
http://regiops.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ROW8-PPT-RSP-Transition-of-an-RDAP-enabled-TLD-Gavin-Brown.pdf
Justin Mack (MarkMonitor)
01:05:25
The 301 redirect has a small problem:If the TLD is not "distinct" in the path, such as only "https://example.registry/rdap", the registry can't redirect because that URL may serve multiple TLDs, while only one TLD is migrating.The solution is to add the TLD to the URL (hostname or path) so that it can be transitioned with the http redirect. Ideally each base URL in the "dns.json" registry would be unique. Not a requirement, just a best practice.(This comment is simply an informative note as I was reading the presentation.)
Scott Hollenbeck (Verisign)
01:06:51
+1, Marc
Sarah Wyld
01:14:26
I really didn't feel like the last public session had much engagement from non-wg members...
Sarah Wyld
01:14:41
I mean, i'll do it
Sarah Wyld
01:14:50
but not sure it's worthwhile at this point
Sue Schuler
01:15:06
it was confusing that ICANN had a public session on RDAP as well
Sarah Wyld
01:15:13
Sue is correct
Sarah Wyld
01:15:20
and it would've been nice if anyone not in the WG had questions to discuss
Justin Mack (MarkMonitor)
01:16:37
I'm a "meh" on the public session
Catherine Merdinger
01:16:41
I agree - I don’t think it will be particularly productive
Sarah Wyld
01:18:45
+1 for "meh"
Roger Carney
01:18:52
+1 Marc
Sue Schuler
01:18:53
sorry...…..lost my internet connection
Sue Schuler
01:19:06
what was the concensus?
Marc Blanchet
01:20:08
To Sue: I think there is no public session.
Sue Schuler
01:20:15
thanks
Sue Schuler
01:23:43
next meeting for GDD Summit Planning on the 18th
Marc Anderson (Verisign / RySG)
01:23:55
No concerns, I support having an RDAP meeting at GDD summit.
Karla Hakansson
01:25:21
GDD Summit Planning topic proposal link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1z7lfi1CT1yezZqUm_QTFviv2Y4HlOF_feNqkjicX0NI/edit#gid=0
Sarah Wyld
01:26:05
Good summary Marc, yeah
Sarah Wyld
01:26:25
we had good input from RDAP WG folks on that, actually!
Sarah Wyld
01:26:31
the irt timing thing
Sarah Wyld
01:27:30
Thanks, all!
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:27:34
Thanks all!
Catherine Merdinger
01:27:37
thanks everyone!