Logo

Nathalie Peregrine's Personal Meeting Room
David McAuley (Verisign)
35:07
none here
David McAuley (Verisign)
35:16
nope
Ariel Liang
35:46
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OnFqzjkFTJEw0rzvaiBqAKLVnbbli-c_5t9aV2TEt10/edit#heading=h.1t3h5sf
Steve DelBianco
37:49
Has ccNSO given any reaction to the edited docs?
Heather Forrest
38:30
I'm not sure if we would anticipate reaction, based on the call - everyone seemed pretty on board
Steve DelBianco
38:45
To clarify, didn’t a ccNSO rep (Katrina?) help you to make these edits, David?
David McAuley (Verisign)
39:36
Not Katrina, Steve, but Bart
Heather Forrest
40:52
Katrina was concerned about summer holidays, hence I don't think we should do a 'last call' now
Steve DelBianco
41:26
interesting that the MIN time is only half as long as the MAX time.
Steve DelBianco
41:44
Do we think that 90 days will feel fast enough to those concerned about urgency?
David McAuley (Verisign)
44:40
I think I said I would look at timeline too and forgot to do that, will give it a go
Ariel Liang
45:27
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v5qtCO0Ocrbkk6o2YVrsuIWwjTQsprdEmWBYD35OH6o/edit
Steve DelBianco
46:05
just pick up where you left off
Steve DelBianco
48:25
Agree we should say Representative instead of Chair
Steve DelBianco
49:49
it’s so thoughtful that Heather says “Summer” for our benefit, since it’s Winter where she is!
Steve DelBianco
52:00
“In no event later than” could be said simply as “within"
Julie Hedlund
52:13
We did put in a timeline
David McAuley (Verisign)
52:15
yes, thanks Heather
Steve DelBianco
53:20
yup. You are over-languificating !
David McAuley (Verisign)
53:20
agree with Heather - in no event means stict with bylaws
Heather Forrest
56:37
I think it would be helpful to put in a note here, as Council is likely to have the same question.
Heather Forrest
56:47
Maybe we simply put in a footnote to the relevant Bylaws provision
Julie Hedlund
58:19
I think it’s a count of the Decisional Participants. There need to be a certain number voting yes (or no).
Heather Forrest
58:38
I now see the relevant language re abstention in the Bylaws provision we excerpted above.
Steve DelBianco
58:46
For many EC decisions, the bylaws say approval occurs unless more than 1 OBJECTS to an approval action
Julie Hedlund
59:53
Thanks Steve. We’ll confirm but I think that’s the case here too.
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:01:40
T-21 - here I think 'within' would be better than 'in'
Heather Forrest
01:01:45
Doc deadline rule does apply
Steve DelBianco
01:03:22
keep in mind that some decisions requested by GNSO and ccNSO go to the full EC, who can reject the action. Is that true of IFRs too?
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:04:33
This discussion makes me think appplicants to GNSO Council should be informed that among their responsibilites is to be available on short notice when EC issues comes up
Steve DelBianco
01:04:45
Okay, never mind about IFR rejections. We’ll look later
Heather Forrest
01:05:54
aha - GNSO Councillors
Steve DelBianco
01:08:20
for each of the 3 Approval Action decisions in this section of bylaws, Approval requires 3 yes AND no more than 1 no.
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:11:28
no objection
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:12:09
Ariel is about as fast as imaginable in document revision - amazing
Julie Hedlund
01:12:18
Yes, she is amazing!
Ariel Liang
01:12:28
(Blush)
Steve DelBianco
01:13:02
That’s why Absentions are strategic and really do matter.
Julie Hedlund
01:13:21
No changes to the templates
Julie Hedlund
01:13:32
Staff highlighted where links need to be made or options
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:15:03
not here
Steve DelBianco
01:15:05
all good
Julie Hedlund
01:16:07
ALL GOOD :-)
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:16:09
sounds good
Ariel Liang
01:16:32
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17bftPSj8N4xBUebP0F7s-qS51cel_pL-vyQimKGmOK0/edit
Steve DelBianco
01:17:42
THIS section is where the EC could reject an IFR Recommendation that GNSO and ccNSO have previously approved
Steve DelBianco
01:20:11
Yup. When we did these bylaws in 2016 we wanted to allow each AC/SO decisional participant to decide it’s own procedures to arrive at its decision.
Heather Forrest
01:20:37
@Steve - for GNSO does that also mean decision-making within the SG/Cs?
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:23:24
I regret to say I have a hard stop at top of hour
Julie Hedlund
01:24:58
@Steve: noted
Julie Hedlund
01:27:15
Yes, we can do an overall timeline. Also there are some graphics that the EC Administration has created that shows the process overall.
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:28:21
right
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
01:29:02
It would be good to know where flexibility is given in the timeline and which time periods are prescribed by the bylaws
Julie Hedlund
01:29:18
Noted Wolf-Ulrich
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:29:57
Thanks Heather, Julie, Ariel, and all, gotta run
Julie Hedlund
01:30:07
Old hand Steve?
Julie Hedlund
01:30:11
Thanks David!
Ariel Liang
01:30:35
Thanks everyone