
35:07
none here

35:16
nope

35:46
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OnFqzjkFTJEw0rzvaiBqAKLVnbbli-c_5t9aV2TEt10/edit#heading=h.1t3h5sf

37:49
Has ccNSO given any reaction to the edited docs?

38:30
I'm not sure if we would anticipate reaction, based on the call - everyone seemed pretty on board

38:45
To clarify, didn’t a ccNSO rep (Katrina?) help you to make these edits, David?

39:36
Not Katrina, Steve, but Bart

40:52
Katrina was concerned about summer holidays, hence I don't think we should do a 'last call' now

41:26
interesting that the MIN time is only half as long as the MAX time.

41:44
Do we think that 90 days will feel fast enough to those concerned about urgency?

44:40
I think I said I would look at timeline too and forgot to do that, will give it a go

45:27
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v5qtCO0Ocrbkk6o2YVrsuIWwjTQsprdEmWBYD35OH6o/edit

46:05
just pick up where you left off

48:25
Agree we should say Representative instead of Chair

49:49
it’s so thoughtful that Heather says “Summer” for our benefit, since it’s Winter where she is!

52:00
“In no event later than” could be said simply as “within"

52:13
We did put in a timeline

52:15
yes, thanks Heather

53:20
yup. You are over-languificating !

53:20
agree with Heather - in no event means stict with bylaws

56:37
I think it would be helpful to put in a note here, as Council is likely to have the same question.

56:47
Maybe we simply put in a footnote to the relevant Bylaws provision

58:19
I think it’s a count of the Decisional Participants. There need to be a certain number voting yes (or no).

58:38
I now see the relevant language re abstention in the Bylaws provision we excerpted above.

58:46
For many EC decisions, the bylaws say approval occurs unless more than 1 OBJECTS to an approval action

59:53
Thanks Steve. We’ll confirm but I think that’s the case here too.

01:01:40
T-21 - here I think 'within' would be better than 'in'

01:01:45
Doc deadline rule does apply

01:03:22
keep in mind that some decisions requested by GNSO and ccNSO go to the full EC, who can reject the action. Is that true of IFRs too?

01:04:33
This discussion makes me think appplicants to GNSO Council should be informed that among their responsibilites is to be available on short notice when EC issues comes up

01:04:45
Okay, never mind about IFR rejections. We’ll look later

01:05:54
aha - GNSO Councillors

01:08:20
for each of the 3 Approval Action decisions in this section of bylaws, Approval requires 3 yes AND no more than 1 no.

01:11:28
no objection

01:12:09
Ariel is about as fast as imaginable in document revision - amazing

01:12:18
Yes, she is amazing!

01:12:28
(Blush)

01:13:02
That’s why Absentions are strategic and really do matter.

01:13:21
No changes to the templates

01:13:32
Staff highlighted where links need to be made or options

01:15:03
not here

01:15:05
all good

01:16:07
ALL GOOD :-)

01:16:09
sounds good

01:16:32
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17bftPSj8N4xBUebP0F7s-qS51cel_pL-vyQimKGmOK0/edit

01:17:42
THIS section is where the EC could reject an IFR Recommendation that GNSO and ccNSO have previously approved

01:20:11
Yup. When we did these bylaws in 2016 we wanted to allow each AC/SO decisional participant to decide it’s own procedures to arrive at its decision.

01:20:37
@Steve - for GNSO does that also mean decision-making within the SG/Cs?

01:23:24
I regret to say I have a hard stop at top of hour

01:24:58
@Steve: noted

01:27:15
Yes, we can do an overall timeline. Also there are some graphics that the EC Administration has created that shows the process overall.

01:28:21
right

01:29:02
It would be good to know where flexibility is given in the timeline and which time periods are prescribed by the bylaws

01:29:18
Noted Wolf-Ulrich

01:29:57
Thanks Heather, Julie, Ariel, and all, gotta run

01:30:07
Old hand Steve?

01:30:11
Thanks David!

01:30:35
Thanks everyone
Zoom would like to update your account settings. When joining a meeting or webinar by entering a meeting ID, participants will be required to enter a password. Participants joining using a meeting invite link will not be required to enter a password. Learn More
This change will be effective on . If approved or declined, the change will take effect immediately.