Welcome to the WT5 call on Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 20:00 UTC for 90 minutes.
Morning, all - sorry I can't speak right now but I do have an SOI update.
I have been elected IPC president and will begin the role on 1 Dec.
Thanks, Cheryl - much appreciated
Oh delighted to read that to the record mate
Hello To All
Thanks very much, Annebeth
We understand and have heard your point of view here Christopher, which is why, of course we welcome any Minority Reports
but we have all been working towards what improveents to the 2012 round that we could achieve
and feel free to raise this again in the Plenary discussions
Moving on then T'hanks
We don’t have a lot of time to go over and over disagreements from long ago.
and @Robin that is of course not the intention of the WT Co-Leads at this stage I can assure you
yes, I appreciate that, Cheryl.
we are up to the "What can you live with at this stage" part of the consensus building work Team
To clarify, Alexander is suggesting a slightly different wording compared to the current text
It doesn’t appear to change the meaning
It would be helpful to know if members support Alexander’s suggested re-wording
Alexander's wording seems a liottle clearer
Stick to the substantial things to review today
you can all browse the redline for the minor clean-ups at your leisure
zooming along (pardon the pun ;-)
We should not open up earlier discussions - this Suggestion has not been agreed upon.
Maybe it was just not mmuch positive response?
I believe this was a proposal that Alexander raised on the mailing list, but there was not significant discussion in response.
There are several references to international law that should be complemented by ‘and applicable local law’.
not so much objection as no obvious support either I suspect (if memory serves)
ah,. ok Emily
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
Agree with Martin that part of the difficulty was the lack of support as opposed to the lack of negative comments
OK, thanks for that
Try and rally some obvious support on the list perhaps @Susan
Not to be unduly pedantic, please refer to Latin alphabet. (Not Roman). Please do not refer to the ‘ASCII ROOT. (Try ‘ASCII equivalent’)
and No Comment will be taken as no strong objections
@Christopher, the text in the report comes directly from the proposal as it was put forward by the member and discussed by the group
We could however note that as an edit for the PDP full Final Report though if ypu all agree in the plenary process
It is irritating that both "Consensus" and "strong support but significant Opposition" state that most members support.
There is only a slight variant in the amount of opposition - is this supposed to be the case?
GNSO Operating Procedures: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/op-procedures-18jun18-en.pdf
Yes, these have been GNSO definitions for years now.
See Standard Methodology for Making Decisions, section 3.6
on page 53
we’ll include in the meeting notes
Hello. Sorry for being late
Saturday from 12:15 to 15:00
Brilliant effort people your homework ids to come but getting to the end here
Thanks, Martin and all, bye!
Thanks to all!
Well done THANKS everyone Bye for now