Logo

Terri Agnew's Personal Meeting Room - Shared screen with speaker view
Alexander Schubert
22:10
HiHi
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
22:26
I am in two calls sorry so forgive some tardiness in reactios from me for the 1st half of the call at least
Andrea Glandon
22:45
:)
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
23:21
ru=inse and repeat AGenda :-)
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
23:31
ergh typos
Steve Chan
23:44
Link here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q6_DxsCvSA_3B7ArncO2U4tWNY3vH7Wi4nINrouR4AI/edit?usp=sharing
Donna Austin, Neustar
27:08
Why are we supporting 'at any level', rather than just 'top level'?
Rubens Kuhl
27:56
Yeap, SSAC mentioned all levels.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
28:05
Yup
Donna Austin, Neustar
28:24
Just wondering if it is beyond scope.
Rubens Kuhl
32:42
I think feasibility is already mentioned in the implementation guidance, so it seems ICANN Org mostly agrees.
Kristine Dorrain (Amazon Registry)
33:02
Hi sorry I'm late.
Rubens Kuhl
33:36
;-)
Rubens Kuhl
41:25
Phil, your audio is leaking.
Jim Prendergast
42:53
on CQs - sorry if I missed it - but why do we have the "to the extent possible" qualifying language?
Rubens Kuhl
43:36
Jim, due to some public questions cross-referencing private questions.
Jim Prendergast
44:02
ok - thanks
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
49:05
@jim 0 I agree
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
49:13
I think the report said that
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
49:38
Noted @Jim
Rubens Kuhl
49:42
A registry service might be performed by a service provider different from the one providing basic domain registration services.
Rubens Kuhl
50:21
.secure validation
Emily Barabas
50:51
Preliminary recommendation text in the Initial Report: 2.7.7.c.5: Consolidate the technical evaluation across applications as much as feasible,even when not using a pre-approved RSP. For example, if there are multipleapplications using the same non-pre-approved RSP, that RSP would only have to beevaluated once as opposed to being evaluated for each individual application.
Steve Chan
53:55
I wonder if this bullet: Retain the same questions (except Q30b - Security Policy)
Steve Chan
54:28
Might need a qualifying statement, since there is also a suggestion to improve the clarity. So maybe it’s more about the framework of questions?
Emily Barabas
55:06
RySG suggested something along these lines in their comment.
Rubens Kuhl
55:07
Steve, I believe you are right. Perhaps "retain the same substance of questions" ?
Steve Chan
55:47
@Rubens, sure, unless I hear otherwise
Jim Prendergast
59:04
Im pretty sure ICANN is not signing that contract without that $$$$ upfront.
Rubens Kuhl
01:00:06
To replace the "no other financial questions" text, the text before the questions could say "the following is a sample set of questions".
Rubens Kuhl
01:00:39
Or "sample exhaustive set of questions".
Rubens Kuhl
01:02:26
.neumann will be the TLD with most competitors in the next procedure.
Alexander Schubert
01:02:44
Hand is up
Rubens Kuhl
01:04:38
In Q47, someone would have certified that business plan as feasible.
Rubens Kuhl
01:06:28
Someone would have to lie in order to do that.
Rubens Kuhl
01:07:42
Just repeating the certification would cover that.
Rubens Kuhl
01:08:31
I think that was part of the background check part, not of the financial evaluation.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:08:37
yup
Rubens Kuhl
01:09:20
It says "applicant jurisdiction".
Rubens Kuhl
01:14:28
Agree with Jeff, it comes with the territory.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:15:02
yes indeed!
Peter LaMantia
01:16:12
agree with Jeff on this as well
Rubens Kuhl
01:17:13
I remember something like that too.
Emily Barabas
01:17:34
In 2.7.7.c.12: “ICANN won’t provide financial models or tools, but it will define goals andpublish lists of RSPs, organizations (like RySG and BRG) and consultants”
Emily Barabas
01:17:48
(preliminary recommendation)
Emily Barabas
01:18:04
I believe the BC comment was in response to this sentence
Peter LaMantia
01:21:04
Aside from not sharing security policies and processes, security processes are in a constant state of change as new vulnerability risks emerge.
Rubens Kuhl
01:21:19
Curious someone called a security policy a security threat...
Rubens Kuhl
01:22:54
I believe RrSG and GAC divergences are somewhat off-topic...
Peter LaMantia
01:24:07
They could pose yes/no questions.
Martin Sutton
01:26:00
I think that would be a useful approach Jeff, thanks
Justine Chew
01:26:03
Agree with Jeff. Also how often the policy is activated, reviewed/updated, for eg
Peter LaMantia
01:26:06
Check box questionairre as per typical ITSec vendor reviews
Rubens Kuhl
01:31:45
NCSG seems to not have noticed that the language says "independently certified".
Jim Prendergast
01:34:02
i thought it was fortune 500 - but if there is a qualification it needs to clearly indicated
Emily Barabas
01:34:06
“If any of the following conditions are met, an applicant should be allowed to self-certify that it has the financial means to support its proposed business model associated with the TLD: If the applicant is a company traded on an applicable national public market; If the applicant and/or its Officers are bound by law in its jurisdiction to represent financials accurately; If the applicant is a current Registry Operator that is not in default on any of its financial obligations under its applicable Registry Agreements, and has not previously triggered the utilization of its Continued Operations Instrument. “
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:35:08
Publicly traded company means different things in different jurisdictions. Many are not as highly regulated as in the US. ( I passed the Series 7 and Series 24 back in the day.)
Jim Prendergast
01:35:38
We need to look into this and come back to it
Rubens Kuhl
01:35:49
ICANN listed some exchanges throughout the world in an application notice and they were only large ones, NYSE / NASDAQ types.
trang.nguyen
01:35:56
It’s companies traded in the top 20 exchanges.
Rubens Kuhl
01:36:13
But that content was in a phased-out system, SugarCRM.
Steve Chan
01:37:55
Jeff, you have a hand up from Trang
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
01:42:31
This is what there was high level agreement on: "Financial statements (audited, certified by an officer with professional duty in applicant jurisdiction to represent financial information correctly or independently certified if not publicly-listed or current RO in good standing)” (0-1 scoring) (certification posted)
Rubens Kuhl
01:42:41
It's not only the self-certification is different, the criteria is different. So understanding whether self-certification applies or not to the new criteria is the discussion at this point.
Rubens Kuhl
01:43:30
Yeap, correct.
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
01:45:18
@Ruben - Can you confirm? I believe that is how it came out.
Rubens Kuhl
01:45:30
That's my recollection as well.
trang.nguyen
01:46:41
Thank you!
Rubens Kuhl
01:47:04
Exhibit A
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:47:46
Lots covered today people... DO remember your homewok on Registry Services for the next call... Bye for now then....
Rubens Kuhl
01:47:54
Bye all!
Steve Chan
01:47:59
Thursday, 05 September 2019 at 03:00
Jim Prendergast
01:48:04
30 hours from now
Jim Prendergast
01:48:20
29.5 actually