Logo

Terri Agnew's Personal Meeting Room
Julie Bisland
40:31
Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group on Thursday, 05 September 2019 at 03:00 UTC.
Maxim Alzoba
40:39
will be disconnecting from time to time, due to weird connectivity
Julie Bisland
41:15
Thank you, Maxim
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
41:37
just having LOTS of calls @Jeff
Steve Chan
42:30
Online version of the document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q6_DxsCvSA_3B7ArncO2U4tWNY3vH7Wi4nINrouR4AI/edit?usp=sharing
Steve Chan
43:04
Bottom of page 46
Justine Chew
45:15
Exhibit A
Maxim Alzoba
48:31
Also use of IDN (if any) is in Exhibit A
Maxim Alzoba
49:39
and if a TLD uses IDN(s) , it is checked during RST process (what is supported in the backend of the TLD)
Maxim Alzoba
50:16
@Jeff, you might pick any IDN TLDs
Maxim Alzoba
50:18
from
Maxim Alzoba
51:02
all Registries have to provide Searchable WHOIS to LEAs (protected and restricted)
Jim Prendergast
51:07
got them a bonus point in eval if I rememebr correctly.
Rubens Kuhl
51:55
Jim, correct.
Rubens Kuhl
57:57
RegistryLock
Rubens Kuhl
58:36
BTAPPA is the one with the coolest acronym
Rubens Kuhl
58:50
(Bulk Transfer After Partial Portfolio Acquisition)
Maxim Alzoba
01:00:03
RESP abbreviation itself is two things: process and policy
Justine Chew
01:00:33
@Maxim, RESP or RSEP?
Maxim Alzoba
01:00:40
RSEP :)
Rubens Kuhl
01:03:07
"China Gateway" is the most usual implementation of validated registration.
Jim Prendergast
01:04:03
is it standardized?
Rubens Kuhl
01:04:29
The agreement amendments for Validation are indeed standardised.
Rubens Kuhl
01:05:11
2nd service in https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/fast-track-rsep-process-authorization-language-2019-06-14-en
Jim Prendergast
01:06:09
didnt realize that
Jim Prendergast
01:08:38
i think the crux of the argument is that ICANN should have never approved them in the first place. but need to enage NCUC on this. Is anyone from them on the call?
Rubens Kuhl
01:08:58
Robin, perhaps ?
Justine Chew
01:09:58
Do I understand correctly that we are looking to amend/add to Approved Services under Exhibit A for next version of AGB?
Rubens Kuhl
01:10:39
Justine, it would be only Q23.
Rubens Kuhl
01:10:57
Not able to talk.
Justine Chew
01:11:05
@Rubens, right, thanks.
Rubens Kuhl
01:13:00
Yes it is accurate.
Justine Chew
01:13:36
So Ruben's "Pre-approved services" means those in Exhibit A which is not subject to evaluation. Anything outside Exhibit A is subject to evaluation.
Rubens Kuhl
01:13:57
Even those subject to evaluation will end up in Exhibit A.
Justine Chew
01:14:10
Right, thanks!
Rubens Kuhl
01:14:55
Jim, not, although RySG suggested that.
Rubens Kuhl
01:15:33
It would only be the ones that are on the Fast-Track RSEP having templates.
Jim Prendergast
01:17:11
ok
Rubens Kuhl
01:17:28
BTW, xPML is not currently part of the Fast-Track RSEP options. It might be added down the road.
Rubens Kuhl
01:18:48
The panel is actually RSTEP, also confusing with RSEP.
Steve Chan
01:23:16
“…should not be required to pay a higher application fee, unless an RSTEP is required.” - I believe this is consistent with the 2012 round, if I’m not mistaken?
Heather Forrest
01:23:21
Makes sense, Jeff.
Heather Forrest
01:23:27
You bet, bro.
Rubens Kuhl
01:23:28
This clause was added in WT4 discussion in order to foster innovation by not making it more expensive.
Justine Chew
01:23:52
Yes, make sense.
Rubens Kuhl
01:24:40
ICANN Org suggestion makes sense, as long as it applies only to subsequent procedures.
Justine Chew
01:24:42
Is that for implementation?
Justine Chew
01:25:28
Okay.
Justine Chew
01:32:41
Emily's note on 2.7.7.17 -- Can we refine the reference to "list of previously approved registry services (IDN Languages, GPML, BTAPPA) will be included by reference in the AGB and RA" to make it clear which service will be included in the AGB and which will be included in the RA in respect of recommendations for implementation?
Rubens Kuhl
01:33:30
The language says to include a list by reference, so it wouldn't list specifically each service would be included.
Heather Forrest
01:36:59
I'm still on board, Jeff
Rubens Kuhl
01:37:23
Yeap, and even if we want to change that, it would require changing the registry services policy, not part of SubPro charter.
Rubens Kuhl
01:42:25
And the minimalist registry services idea didn't get much traction in WT4 discussions anyways.
Rubens Kuhl
01:48:44
This paragraph seems to belong to "Other Topics".
Maxim Alzoba
01:49:12
bye all, have to drop the call
Rubens Kuhl
01:55:06
There is a collision between SubPro and SSAC. ;-)
Steve Chan
01:55:37
Confirmed that the next topics are Name Collisions and Objections
Steve Chan
01:55:46
And the call time is Monday, 09 September 2019 at 15:00 UTC for 90 minutes
Steve Chan
01:57:56
Sorry, the vacuum is super loud!
Heather Forrest
01:58:15
Thanks, Jeff - good work chairing at a very late hour in your time zone.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:58:19
lots covered today... thanks everyone... bye until next call then...
Heather Forrest
01:59:40
We can hope for breathing room given that the AGM is longer than the Policy Forum....
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
02:00:08
slammed together I suspect still all up the start
Jim Prendergast
02:00:09
ok - yeah - all subject to change - i think it was unfortunate the way it was scheduled last meeting
Steve Chan
02:00:12
@Jeff, that’s what I recall as well (Sat and Mon)
Heather Forrest
02:00:37
bye, all
Justine Chew
02:00:38
Thanks, all.
Rubens Kuhl
02:00:40
Bye all!
Vaibhav Aggarwal(Tiger), IN
02:00:50
Thanks Bye Bye Now