Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en

no

I am new. On last year but no meetings.

Good morning from Kingston to all. Apologies for the late join

See: https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/GAC+Liaison+-+2020

We have reported wiki temporary maintenance and it is a work in progress to getting it fixed.

Thanks Terri!

Julf, I’m not able to raise my hand, but I did want to mention something in response to Maxim

+1 to Marie's compliment to Julf

+1

that's what zoom sessions are here for :)

only to punishment sessions?

:)

interesting, so basically "you" need "the network"

thanks

(obvisouly we don't want to overly focus on the current situation, hopefully this will change maybe something to bear in mind though)

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=OFikUjTbv3tn4wK_2B5Sra1TjWONWOqEjhYGYC_2BU3aTgNrg3IzRvxbJMTj5KZ0p6pr

hand up

Agree with Maxim.

we will have to process individual nominations

I had asked for a question to be placed in the survey to ask if candidate had SG/C support

Carlton first

no problem

hand up

nope

No applications have been received

no problem, but the communication needs to come out this week, preferrably before midnight

at least one application would be nice

Repeat call with a simple clarifying cover mail, Maxim?

@Marie +1

something like 'Please send your endorsement in the form of email in addition of the application sent by the candidate'

@Emily yes, we should allow all contenders but endorsed candidates should be noted

I think it is ok

Languages?

The instructions should instruct individual candidates to seek their SG/C endorsement, yes?

@Sam yes. But also point out that endorsement is not a pre-requisite for candidacy

I am not sure it is a valid reason

it would help thought

Not an absolute Maxim - just a benefit

@Marie, yes, language skills are always premium for engaging in "political" discussions so yes, I think this is a good one to add.

That's it exactly Carlton!

+1 Rafik, that what's I meant

maybe just something to bear in mind when we review the candidates

in the beginning

not a prerequisite

@Rafik, noted. Valid point.

Understood! Just thought it fitted in bullet one on the screen.

Just a note that the call for volunteers does not say that SG/Cs need to submit only a single applicant

and also doesn’t say that by submitting an application it is providing a formal endorsement

Understood

We will relay this to Council leadership

I would also suggest that based on the way the liaison work has evolved and with Julf's recall of his experience, the "political' engagements are the most fruitful for real intelligence. I think language skills would be a plus. Maybe we can look at that in context of reviewing the quals for this specific liaison at some point?

I love these calls! Very business like! Thanks all.

Thanks and good by