Her reference to Jeff is to Jeff Neuman - who is co-chair with Cheryl of the SubPro Working Group

Closed generics = common words but not available for registration. e.g. .book but it’s wholly managed by the registry and not available for people to register e.g. jiarong.book

I had aimed to keep it to the 10 min time

and feel free to put your hand up too if you want to join the queue ahead of time

EPDP = Expedited Policy Development Process

EPDP - Expedited Policy Development process - to address the issues raised by the EU GDPR - General Data Protection Regime

I think R stands for Regulation

EPDP2 Public comment that just closed - https://www.icann.org/public-comments/epdp-phase-2-initial-2020-02-07-en

but worth reading for those interested

You’re right - Regulation - I’ve used the term GDPR too long

(in fact, because it is a ‘regulation’ it takes effect on all 27 EU countries - unlike a Directive which simply directs EU countries to enact national law to reflect the Directive

i think this survey is still open: https://icannprds.typeform.com/to/ehG295

not sure

:-P

Rafik's resources:Phase 2 Building Blocks: https://community.icann.org/x/k5ICBwEPDP Initial Report: https://go.icann.org/2E6DEbhEPDP Final Report: https://go.icann.org/2TNA63gEPDP Webpage: https://go.icann.org/2O8UTP6EPDP Workspace: https://go.icann.org/2LKujuFEPDP Charter: https://go.icann.org/2MsBAAx

TLS - Transport Layer Security. DNS over TLS also known as DoT

@edmon to be accurate the questionnaire you shared is from GDD, not from EPDP team

great learning outcome from Internet Evengilist....Kidos

@rafik thx for the clarification

typo : kudos

Using DoT or DNS over HTTP (DoH) centralises DNS resolution which deviates from the decentralised model of the DNS

Decentralized -> Centralized...usually considered a bad idea.

and also the privacy "gain" may not be so "true" given that the "centralized" provider does get all the data

you have additional privacy from your ISP and any sniffers in between but as it becomes more centralized it may mean your overall privacy could be reduced

the At-Large sessions are informative and you can view recordings and transcripts of these sessions at: https://67.schedule.icann.org/meetings

Holly's links:ALAC Letter to the Board on DNS Abusehttps://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/13747ICANN 67: DoH/DoT Sessionhttps://67.schedule.icann.org/meetings/1152526ICANN 67 – One World, One Internet sessionhttps://67.schedule.icann.org/meetings/1152529SSAC 108 The Implications of DNS Over HTTPS and DNS Over TLShttps://www.icann.org/groups/ssac/documents

Minor correction: it’s SSAC 109, not 108

Thanks Korry, I was about to do it.

wisely the link is the document listing. :-)

guess both how meeting went and highlights of the discussions at the SG?

Thanks for pointing that out Korry!

Thanks Donna - to worked very well

Thanks - In the presentation Paul gave, it was SSAC 108 - but something got published before

Transcript from the RySG session that includes the DNS Abuse discusion: https://static.ptbl.co/static/attachments/237911/1584623218.pdf?1584623218

https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/project

https://rrsg.org/guide-to-registrar-abuse-reporting-practices/

time to think about what questions you have as well :-) for everyone online.

please also feel free to type any questions/comments you have into the chat

And this time, it will be in a better time zone for the ApAC region

Indeed!

Interesting to hear that remote meetings have their own advantages! Jumping in and out of sessions is a lot easier online

advantage of remote meeting!

yes but If you don’t fall asleep in between :)

or other business jumping in

comments and questions are welcome!

hahahha

type in the chat

@jaewon 감사합니다

LOL Edmon

That doesn’t count, Edmon

XD

no wonder haha

Ahh so much easier than the night shift with ICANN and day shift with the real world :-)

indeed we did Pam

That doesn’t count. I managed half the meetings

right. 11pm for UTC+9 is better than UTC+11 and +13

Akinori did night shift - and in his office!

he can share if there’s time

If you think it would be interesting.

i will come to you akinori

okay

akinori - connect your mike pls

Sorry all, I have to leave earlier. Thanks for attending.

o think I did- I have two devices

Thanks Rafik

Thanks Rafik!

@Akinori - cool

QUESTION: How about preparations for ICANN68? Can we be enlighten with this? :-)

That’s about 4 questions - the SubPro, the DNS Abuse, implementation of the CCT….

Oops. That sounds like a long list. Didn't realise. Sorry about that

no worries

+1 Cheryl

Thank you!

The past rounds and current things re DNS Abuse must be dealt with urgently and effectively but as a wider Community exercise not a SubPro one

The only involvement of the board was the TINY reference in my presentation to Leon Sanchez’ participation in the One World, one Int4ernet session

indeed Cheryl! completely agree

I need to go but thanks so much for this call

thanks for joining Annaliese

Re the being in several meetings at once... I was still a little disappointed that with the cut down/reduced Agenda's in vICANN67 I/we still ended up with so many clashes... Or overlapping session occasionally on the same or related topic(s)

if it wasn't shortened, apac community would have suffered further! thx for the efforts!

Agree Akinori this experience is a good foundation for future v Meeting(s)

Youth4ig mentorship program is currently calling for applications for the apac youth to be further engaged in Internet Governance. If there's any youth here needing more support and guidance while getting familiarized with ICANN ecosystem, feel free to join the program!https://youth4ig.asia/youth4ig-mentorship-2020/

Agree with Akinori - the time zone allowed us to have our day jobs run without interruption even if with a bit of sleep depravation

For the future, distributing the meeting over more days, with less meeting hours per day, may ease the pressure

Okay

agree!

+1 Satish

+1 Satish

+1 Satish

It seems highly unlikely to me that ICANN68 will be conducted face-to-face. I'd be interested if anyone has heard anything from the Board on when they will make a decision about ICANN68.

That is so true - it is both an advantage - and a disadvantage since you don’t bump into people - which are the benefits of an in person meetings

Agee JiaRong - yet to invent virtual corridors talk, virtual cocktail.

I invented virtual Morning Walk already. :-)

:-)

there may be other ways to overcome some of the limitations that timezones create. icann staff could rotate over a 12 hour period.

no

ICANN Strategic Plan:https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/strategic-plan-2021-2025-24jun19-en.pdf

I was impressed with the virtual morning walk idea @Maemura

APAC Regional Plan FY21-25:https://community.icann.org/display/GSEAPAC/Asia+Pacific+%28APAC%29+Regional+Plan+FY21-25

Tried and found it great - @Yeseul

lost audio, only me?

Audio?

No sound?

Audio

No audio here

Same here - no audio

all of u s can hear you Edmon

same

We can hear you Edmon

hold on i got disconnected

yes

I gthink an April session is a great idea!

Agree - April session would be good

April would be great

Agree.

Support the idea for additional session

Agree

agree

Thank you all. Stay safe!

Thank you everyone

Thanks and bye!

thank you everyone!

Bye for now

Bye all

thank you!

Thank you for the APAC office and all the other speakers for this session.

Thanks for joining!

Thank you.

thanks

Bye!

Thanks a lot, everyone!!

thx bye, stay healthy

Thank you everyone! See you next time

Thanks and stay safe