Logo

051040040 RPMs in all gTLDS PDP WG - Shared screen with speaker view
Andrea Glandon
39:13
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.
Julie Hedlund
49:54
hand up from Susan
Mary Wong
51:00
That’s correct, Susan. The specific suggestion was not discussed by the WG.
Julie Hedlund
51:19
So the Sub Group could consider whether to refer it to the full WG
Julie Hedlund
52:07
Hand up from Michael
Julie Hedlund
52:11
and Brian
Griffin Barnett
58:16
There is a ton of background noise when David was speaking
Ariel Liang
58:18
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xMehg9o44bdz85ry0LJvhzoOaKdmJ6SwIrLneMx0Ixc/edit?pli=1#gid=1311753169
Griffin Barnett
58:20
Is it just me?
Ariel Liang
58:59
Yes there seem to be noise
Roger Carney
59:01
+1 Griffin
Andrea Glandon
59:03
No, it’s not just you, Griffin.
Griffin Barnett
59:06
Noise and volume going in and out
Susan.Payne
59:10
david is fading in and out
John McElwaine
59:10
Lots of noise
Andrea Glandon
59:20
@David, there is some background noise on your end.
Griffin Barnett
01:00:31
Might be a headset jostling around?
Griffin Barnett
01:03:04
Michel - we definitely discussed the either/or scenario
Philip Corwin
01:03:05
Agree with Griffin that Spec 13 clarification should be noted.
Susan.Payne
01:03:09
definitely discussed
Griffin Barnett
01:03:19
It was raised as it was originally discussed in the original RPM IRT
Philip Corwin
01:03:30
I think we discussed either/or, but staff can check
Mary Wong
01:03:53
Staff can check for exactly when this was discussed, but we can confirm that it was certainly a topic that was brought up early on.
Michael Karanicolas
01:04:24
Fair enough - would appreciate if staff would take a look, but seems like I stand corrected.
Ariel Liang
01:04:49
Hand up
Mary Wong
01:04:57
It may take us some time but we will do our best to be more specific about where and when. It was quite early, IIRC.
Griffin Barnett
01:06:17
I mean it seems like we did reach a conclusion by recommendation both mandatory Sunrise and TM Claims
Griffin Barnett
01:06:25
*recommending
Philip Corwin
01:06:35
The next one down specifically addresses either/or
Susan.Payne
01:07:53
david you are fading again
Paul McGrady
01:07:54
Can't hear David very well - phasing in and out. Is it just me?
Susan.Payne
01:08:08
maybe are you turning away from mic when you read?
Mary Wong
01:08:29
All, if you are not speaking, please make sure your mic is muted.
Griffin Barnett
01:09:14
Seems like the noise is all coming from David’s mic somehow
Julie Hedlund
01:09:37
All other mics are muted
Philip Corwin
01:09:54
David, you are fading in and out
Andrea Glandon
01:10:33
@David, I am happy to dial out to you as well
Philip Corwin
01:10:36
Better now
Andrea Glandon
01:10:41
It seems to be an issue with the headset
Paul Tattersfield
01:10:44
Distance to microphone?
Ariel Liang
01:15:33
It is the second blue line
Ariel Liang
01:15:35
On the screen
Griffin Barnett
01:16:09
Agree with Susan… isn’t this WG providing an opportunity for CP to provide input on this? And public comment?
Ariel Liang
01:16:11
ICANN org suggests that the WG seek specific input from contracted parties concerning its recommendation to remove grounds (i) and (iii) in Section 6.2.4 of the current TMCH Model of Module 5 of the AGB
Susan.Payne
01:17:56
@Brian, that was my point - I believe we have adequate input from the CPs
Griffin Barnett
01:19:06
So Tucow’s comment would be viewed as sorta a minority statement separate from the CPH comments?
Griffin Barnett
01:19:54
Also not sure Tucows’ comments raised anything new that hadn’t been discussed, and much of it seems to simply seek clarification about which sections of the AGB are meant to be referenced
Paul McGrady
01:20:57
Even if they weren't participating in the WG, the point is that they can if they want. I don't think we want to encourage non-participation by ensuring non-participators get some sort of legislative review opportunity...
Philip Corwin
01:24:01
I didn't see any new thoughts in the comments
Brian Beckham
01:25:00
agree with Susan -- well travelled ground
Griffin Barnett
01:25:21
Agree, I think we can close a bit early and accept that we have made unexpectedly rapid progress today
Griffin Barnett
01:26:04
I would support adding another agenda item going forward, adopting Phil’s suggested approach
Susan.Payne
01:28:49
thanks Phil
Griffin Barnett
01:29:34
Thanks David and all, very productive call today
Philip Corwin
01:29:37
That was solely a personal response/the co-chairs have not yet discussed the ICANN 68 agenda for the full WG
Susan.Payne
01:29:51
thanks david
Zak Muscovitch
01:30:07
Thanks David
Julie Hedlund
01:30:11
nothing from staff
Paul Tattersfield
01:30:12
thanks David, Bye All
Ariel Liang
01:30:17
Thanks all
Julie Hedlund
01:30:19
Thank you very much David!