Logo

IDNs EPDP Charter Drafting Team
Maxim Alzoba
35:45
hello all
Dennis Tan
35:55
Hello Maxim
Dennis Tan
36:00
and everyone
Andrea Glandon
36:17
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en
Ariel Liang
36:48
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-f9Ml-z9LcxVs9WuX53kIkp29j0JLh6d/edit
Jeff Neuman
40:42
correct
Maxim Alzoba
41:33
should apply as the same legal entity
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
44:33
Agree that's the problem to be solved by the EPDP
Maxim Alzoba
48:38
good chance it might miss that
Maxim Alzoba
49:20
because here there are no rules established, so it is not possible to follow it in transfer pdp
Steve Chan
49:52
I think Jeff is correct, but I can confirm with colleagues who are supporting the Transfer Policy PDP
Ariel Liang
50:48
A quick check on the proposed charter for transfer policy doesn’t reveal IDN or variant related questions, but we will reconfirm
Jeff Neuman
51:03
Essentially it would be requesting the transfer of linked names associated with 1 auth code?
Maxim Alzoba
52:08
transfer to another registrar - might be ok, but to another entity is a trouble
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
52:23
I think its a flag for completeness to be mindful of the Transfer Policy and any implications.
Jeff Neuman
52:35
@Maxim - same principle - a transfer of 1 of the linked names results in the transfer of all linked names
Maxim Alzoba
53:46
new hand
Maxim Alzoba
56:54
my question is - should we add this question or not to the charter
Maxim Alzoba
57:08
about the same registrar
Ariel Liang
59:03
I believe we may already have a charter question for this, but we will check
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
01:03:55
Is it because there may be variants unknown to the applicants?
Dennis Tan
01:04:48
in part, yes
Maxim Alzoba
01:10:42
example too
Jeff Neuman
01:12:55
Agree it needs to be consistent
Ariel Liang
01:13:38
Hand up
Ariel Liang
01:15:35
Thanks Dennis
Jeff Neuman
01:15:50
keep going
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
01:15:58
to the top of the hour? yes.
Maxim Alzoba
01:16:37
and IGO ;(
Maxim Alzoba
01:20:39
new hand
Jeff Neuman
01:21:17
Essentially we are saying all linked names need to be transferred
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
01:23:16
I agree with Jeff. How UDRP applies to a variant depends on the policy decided by the EPDP on the treatment of same entity.
Jeff Neuman
01:24:21
The Working Group will need to decide what to do with respect to the Same Entity. If they decide that the same entity controls, then the transfer of one linked name results in the transfer of all linked names.
Maxim Alzoba
01:26:33
why do we miss URS?
Maxim Alzoba
01:26:58
+1 Donna, it is about the grounds for a decision
Maxim Alzoba
01:27:42
currently UDRP and URS do not know about the same entity ifea
Maxim Alzoba
01:27:46
idea
Maxim Alzoba
01:28:44
how the principle of the same entity propagates to RPMs and UDRP?
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
01:30:23
Maxim, until we have a same entity policy we really can't answer the question of how it propogates.
Maxim Alzoba
01:30:47
then we need to add those questions as - if yes - then
Ariel Liang
01:30:57
Hand up
Maxim Alzoba
01:31:48
I have to drop, suggest we continue from this item
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
01:31:55
I need to think it through a bit more Maxim. I hear your concern, but I'm not sure that changes to the UDRP or URS is required.
Jeff Neuman
01:32:35
If the WG is going to have to look at RPMs as well as all of the other things, there is no way this can be an ePDP
Edmon Chung
01:34:03
we discussed this earlier and it could be included in the transfer discussion
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
01:34:50
Perhaps we should have as a charter question, that the WG consider any implications on UDRP, URS etc. of whatever is decided re single entity.
Edmon Chung
01:35:03
thx bye
Pitinan Kooarmornpatana - ICANN org
01:35:09
Thanks all