Logo

IDNs EPDP Charter Drafting Team - Shared screen with speaker view
Julie Bisland
24:18
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.
Ariel Liang
25:04
We will start at a12
Ariel Liang
29:06
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-f9Ml-z9LcxVs9WuX53kIkp29j0JLh6d/edit
Maxim Alzoba
34:44
grandfathering is important
Maxim Alzoba
35:15
the worst single char is emoji, but it is double no no
Ariel Liang
36:20
I think the question is whether we need a13 at all. It doesn’t seem necessary based on the agreed principle #1
Maxim Alzoba
37:37
will recoonrct from the notebook
Maxim Alzoba
38:15
back
Julie Bisland
38:21
Welcome back, Maxim
Maxim Alzoba
41:27
Also SSAC can issue a new relevant recommendation any moment (if they find something )
Steve Chan
42:57
The rationale from the SubPro Final Report notes, “The Working Group believes that it is appropriate to limit single-character gTLDs to only certain scripts and languages, though it does not believe it has the relevant expertise to make this determination. The Working Group would welcome the identification of the limited set of scripts and languages and potentially a specific list of allowable single-character gTLDs (e.g., during implementation), which will substantially increase the predictability of what will likely still remain a case-by-case, manual process.”
Steve Chan
43:24
Which is in the text on screen, but it’s boiling it down to the single issue Edmon is I think talking about.
Maxim Alzoba
43:39
at least languages using only single chars as words :)
Ariel Liang
45:12
Hand up
Ariel Liang
46:17
Thanks Dennis
Maxim Alzoba
47:25
same entity issue
Maxim Alzoba
48:02
some processes only for new TLDS (before the launch of the zone)
Ariel Liang
48:13
Hard to display all the comments related to a6 — but the end comment is to consolidate this question with c4 in the following section
Maxim Alzoba
49:18
ccTLDs obey to ccNSO ideas only if they are part of ccNSO (if they quit or never joined - not the case)
Maxim Alzoba
54:04
re-execution of agreements
Edmon Chung
54:30
why is that "implementation question"?
Edmon Chung
54:38
i mean a3
Maxim Alzoba
55:14
could we scroll up? to a3
Ariel Liang
55:24
We are at a3
Maxim Alzoba
55:38
oh, a6 before a3 , now I see
Ariel Liang
55:51
Hand up
Maxim Alzoba
56:03
RPMs
Maxim Alzoba
56:17
no - it is for second level
Maxim Alzoba
56:24
not for top level
Edmon Chung
57:42
ok, i guess we can strike out implementation question at this time
Maxim Alzoba
59:45
the current TLDs should be an exempt (in case of the current existing varianrts)
Maxim Alzoba
01:02:05
only Registry Operators have Registry Agreements
Maxim Alzoba
01:02:09
old
Maxim Alzoba
01:03:12
you merger with that company :)
Maxim Alzoba
01:04:59
new hand
Ariel Liang
01:08:23
Hand up
Edmon Chung
01:09:30
i like the current flow though as c3 flows from c2
Edmon Chung
01:10:06
not against consolidating if everyone thinks that way :-)
Edmon Chung
01:10:20
agree lets revisit later in final pass
Ariel Liang
01:10:29
cool
Julie Bisland
01:12:57
Next call: Tuesday, 09 February 2021 at 18:00 UTC
Maxim Alzoba
01:13:18
next week I might be on the road (vacations) , will try to attend , not sure
Ariel Liang
01:13:51
Enjoy your holiday Maxim!
Maxim Alzoba
01:14:24
thanks
Maxim Alzoba
01:15:50
bye all
Ariel Liang
01:16:01
Thanks everyone!
Edmon Chung
01:16:08
thx bye