Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.

We will start at a12

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-f9Ml-z9LcxVs9WuX53kIkp29j0JLh6d/edit

grandfathering is important

the worst single char is emoji, but it is double no no

I think the question is whether we need a13 at all. It doesn’t seem necessary based on the agreed principle #1

will recoonrct from the notebook

back

Welcome back, Maxim

Also SSAC can issue a new relevant recommendation any moment (if they find something )

The rationale from the SubPro Final Report notes, “The Working Group believes that it is appropriate to limit single-character gTLDs to only certain scripts and languages, though it does not believe it has the relevant expertise to make this determination. The Working Group would welcome the identification of the limited set of scripts and languages and potentially a specific list of allowable single-character gTLDs (e.g., during implementation), which will substantially increase the predictability of what will likely still remain a case-by-case, manual process.”

Which is in the text on screen, but it’s boiling it down to the single issue Edmon is I think talking about.

at least languages using only single chars as words :)

Hand up

Thanks Dennis

same entity issue

some processes only for new TLDS (before the launch of the zone)

Hard to display all the comments related to a6 — but the end comment is to consolidate this question with c4 in the following section

ccTLDs obey to ccNSO ideas only if they are part of ccNSO (if they quit or never joined - not the case)

re-execution of agreements

why is that "implementation question"?

i mean a3

could we scroll up? to a3

We are at a3

oh, a6 before a3 , now I see

Hand up

RPMs

no - it is for second level

not for top level

ok, i guess we can strike out implementation question at this time

the current TLDs should be an exempt (in case of the current existing varianrts)

only Registry Operators have Registry Agreements

old

you merger with that company :)

new hand

Hand up

i like the current flow though as c3 flows from c2

not against consolidating if everyone thinks that way :-)

agree lets revisit later in final pass

cool

Next call: Tuesday, 09 February 2021 at 18:00 UTC

next week I might be on the road (vacations) , will try to attend , not sure

Enjoy your holiday Maxim!

thanks

bye all

Thanks everyone!

thx bye