Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en

Back - hopefully my laptop will behave

Good morning all. My apologies for the late join. Access issues.

Welcome Carlton.

I could even chat to you if I choose

Scott is here :)

thanks everyone

Hi, Jeff! Have you happened to look at the SSC minutes?

Congrats rafik

The BC has a statement for the record (to be read in later, of course). Thanks.

WAs

I have a statement on behalf of the RrSG

Keith, I’ll do on behalf of the IPC. Thanks.

The ISPCP would like to make a statement too.

I also have my hand up on this item after COuncillor statements of course

The RySG has a statement for the record (to be read in later, of course). Thanks. It will be made by Sebastien Ducos.

And the BC!

I would like to make statement at the end

The RrSG will also be emailing our statement to the list as well

Here's the order of statements: IPC, RySG, ISPCP, BC, RrSG, Cheryl, Rafik

And I encourage all to submit the statements to the GNSO Council list for the record and archives.

a formal question - how many tens of minutes each orator has?

I have serious concerns that we do not have enough time for other Councillors

@Maxim: We have not specified a time per speaker, but we'll need everyone to be concise while making their points and then submitting a full statement to the list.

I think we need to have a freame of time at least to have fairness

All statements sent to the Council mailing list will be included in full in the GNSO Council meeting minutes.

With all due respect after the amount of time allotted to the IPC ALL other statements should be read in full

To do otherwise would be unfair

I'm not intending to cut anyone off, but everyone should try to be concise. We added 30 minutes to the meeting in anticipation of these important statements.

Our statement has been sent to the list

As asked by Keith, we sent the IPC statement to Nathalie.

Well received Flip, thank you!

Ours has gone to the list too.

I am confident procedural points of concern to our ALAC reps were raised in the EPDP

Marie & Michele, well received, thank you

So the review of public comments has already been complete? (16 days ago, right?)

@Tatiana: Yes, the review of public comments is complete and now the WG is developing the final recommendations.

Thanks

We have completed our review of public comments, are in the midst of reviewing the draft final report, and will very soon be at consensus call

Appreciate that Phil

Trust me, never in my wildest dreams did I ever think this WG would go on for more than 4 years when I signed on as a co-chair, and lessons should be learned so it never happens again.

Thank you to Phil and Brian for your commitment.

Here is the link to the agenda, which has links to a relevant documents, including for this item 6: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agenda+24+September+2020

ARS doesn't need to be included - ICANN Org can just do that with no policy work needed.

Transfer Policy

Transfer policy

do we need ARS at all ?

there is no momentum to suport

I am confident the AC'sappreciate this as well @Marie

momentum = velocity (zero) multiplied by mass = zero

Disagree Maxim - we do need ARS, and yes there is "momentum to support".

Noted & thanks Cheryl.

Marie, deadlock is zero speed , so momentum is zero

there is no movement to support

and spending as much time as possible in the same state will lead to the same results

I have a hard stop at the top of the hour but as we have no votes remaining this should not be an issue, for the record I support Phillipe as the incoming Chair and I think he will be a great addition to Council leadership

Thanks James

Councilors: Please remember to set your chat to All Panelists and Attendees for all to be able read the exchanges.

Thanks Terri apologies, for the record the message that Keith was responding toI have a hard stop at the top of the hour but as we have no votes remaining this should not be an issue, for the record I support Phillipe as the incoming Chair and I think he will be a great addition to Council leadership

Marie, deadlock is zero speed , so momentum is zero
there is no movement to support
and spending as much time as possible in the same state will lead to the same results

Thanks James.

Ah so confusing

@Michele it is my understanding that a Bird & Bird opinion concluded a legal basis exists

So leave the wording in and be done with it

Thanks, Sebastien.

Happy to come back to that small team, Pam, thanks.

2nd point was: The board did not say that “we” shouldn’t touch the Thick Whois Transition Policy, the Board for the IRT not to touch it without Council… The Council (we) can touch existing policy if need be.

More than happy, Pam!

Count me in Pam

And me

@Pam - yes and in compliance with the IRT Guidelines

Candidate statement: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/fouquart-statement-20sep20-en.pdf

Thank you all for volunteering for the Rec 7 small drafting team.

Thank you

:) I hope you would have

@Nathalie, please add me to the Rec 7 drafting small team

thanks Philippe, bonne chance :)

Merci beaucoup Philippe !

thans Rafik, merci !!

And thanks Keith. much appreciated. Again if a follow-up is needed, another Q&A, I'll obviosuly reach out to a number of you, but please do the same.

(and thanks Fil)

IMHO, a roll call vote in this context seems appropriate. Afterall, policy decisions on Council are made on a roll call vote! I'm feeling a leadership decision could only measure up to those and no more.

+ 1 Carlton re a roll call vote

thanks all

ICANN69 website: https://meetings.icann.org/en/remote69

Reminder that ICANN69 Prep Week begins on 5 October - and you’ll need to register for the meeting to register for these webinars.

+1 too. Makes (logical & logistical) sense!

SPS survey: http://input.icann.org/go?iv=20x1mb7u8rt7l Please use Chrome/ File/ New Incognito window

Thanks Marie

Bye for now then...

thanks everyone!

Thank you all