Logo

Terri Agnew's Personal Meeting Room
Annebeth Lange
34:35
Sorry that I am late, had problems finding the link
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
35:05
NP Annabeth... Welcome
Javier Rúa-Jovet (ALAC)
35:31
hi! @annebeth!
Annebeth Lange
35:45
Hi all!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
36:08
Can you live with it test is important to exercise as we try to move towards consensus
Annebeth Lange
37:47
Let us work together to avoid that the SubPro will be the Never Ending Story. @Jeff, I think this is a very productive way to work
Jim Prendergast
39:30
ok - thanks
Steve Chan
43:54
Document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUlmZH8nxWTgfcRluA5FxLheMm4XhhOwkRt7om52aQU/edit#
Andrea Glandon
44:12
We have a phone number ending in 305. Is anyone familiar with that number?
Marc Trachtenberg
44:47
That's me - Marc Trachtenberg
Andrea Glandon
44:54
Thank you, Marc!
Julie Hedlund
45:03
We are on page 43 of the Google doc
Rubens Kuhl
45:30
Registry Services evaluation is a mix'n'match of technical and non-technical features.
Elaine Pruis
48:25
Jeff said the evaluation of the application is NOT the same as the pre-evaluation (technical) rest right?
Rubens Kuhl
48:49
All 2 point questions were ones offering extra points for doing extra things, not that they worth more.
Rubens Kuhl
49:05
(compared to other criteria)
Rubens Kuhl
49:35
Abuse handling was 1-point if I recall correctly.
Rubens Kuhl
50:40
ICANN's own PIRR also recommend dropping 2 point questions.
Jim Prendergast
53:28
ok - makes sense
Jim Prendergast
56:24
is Jothan Frakes a member of this group? He was an evaluator and may be able to shed some light on this issue of clarifying questions and why there were so many.
Rubens Kuhl
57:12
All evaluators are bound to confidentiality terms, so he couldn't answer those questions.
Rubens Kuhl
01:03:34
The interpretation of what meet is up to the IRT.
Rubens Kuhl
01:04:09
So AGB gets something implementable.
Paul McGrady
01:06:01
ICANN has some data breaches in the application system, if I remember, making them extra scary to turn over your security plans. Classic example of the regulatory being less sophisticated than the regulatees.
Paul McGrady
01:06:19
had
Rubens Kuhl
01:10:44
Jeff, there was one IG that you skipped.
Rubens Kuhl
01:16:38
Priority is process-wide, so when it comes to technical evaluation, it ends up being publish priority, in order to gain from cost-savings at evaluation.
Elaine Pruis
01:18:06
so the apps wouldn’t be “batched” rather, the next TLD in the queue with that RSP would get a “quick pass”
Rubens Kuhl
01:18:50
Elaine, no. The results would be hold until higher priority apps are evaluated.
Elaine Pruis
01:19:36
yes, just shortening the amount of time the repeat RSP app spends from start to finish
karen.lentz
01:19:46
ok, thank you Jeff and Steve
Rubens Kuhl
01:20:01
And also saving on person-hours to do the evaluations.
Paul McGrady
01:24:12
It truly showed how stuck ICANN was in its second-level-sales mentality.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:24:46
lessons learned and hopefully with these recommendations remediation applied
Rubens Kuhl
01:26:25
currentRegistry needs a space
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:26:44
noted @rubens
Julie Hedlund
01:26:53
fixed
Rubens Kuhl
01:28:45
It intended all options:
Rubens Kuhl
01:29:07
RO, Affiliate of an RO, parent company etc.
Rubens Kuhl
01:30:01
We just need to highlight that the italics was in addition to the 2007 policy.
Paul McGrady
01:33:19
still better than "spirit"...
Rubens Kuhl
01:33:57
Current list of services available in Fast Track RSEP:
Rubens Kuhl
01:33:58
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/fast-track-rsep-process-authorization-language-2019-06-14-en
Rubens Kuhl
01:36:20
Jim, it should be available to the IRT.
Jim Prendergast
01:36:46
when should the examination be completed by?
Rubens Kuhl
01:37:04
It should be earlier than that IMHO.
Rubens Kuhl
01:37:15
So the IRT can use the analysis to tune AGB.
Rubens Kuhl
01:38:29
But this looks more like an envelope note than something to be in the policy.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:38:57
Sounds good @Jeff
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:43:04
probing questions that 'stress test' any decent security policy
Rubens Kuhl
01:44:33
I believe we could read Steve's comment on COI x Registrant Protections, because depending on the COI decision, it might come into play.
Rubens Kuhl
01:45:02
Financial Evaluation
Rubens Kuhl
01:45:45
It's.
Steve Chan
01:45:45
Haha, yes
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:46:47
Great progress Team... Thanks for this... and Bye for now...
Roger Carney
01:46:53
@Jeff only 4 miles
Rubens Kuhl
01:46:56
Bye @ll!
Elaine Pruis
01:47:00
lol