oh happy 2020

James =)

I though James was joining remote

Thanks James!

'snakes in rafters' is either a rock band or a bad movie....

Can you all hear us? Just want to confirm the audio is ok.

yes

audio is fine

@Julf no I live in bushland with a snake (and all beastie friendly way of life

CLO: are the snakes friendly too?

yes overly so at times

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agenda+23+January+2020

wiki agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/8ACJBw

@CLO 'Overly friendly'...indeed! :-)

Wifi here is flaky so a lot of are probably being disconnected + reconnecting etc

We are working to try and get someone off-site to help with screen share. Stay tuned.

I am fine looking at the wiki page agenda :)

That someone is Ariel. Thanks for stepping in at the last second Ariel!

Project List: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/projects-list-13jan20-en.pdf

No problem!

Never the same without you, Ariel!

Aww I miss you all

Action Item list: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items

congrats Amr and Julf!

And Carlton

Congratulation!

Thanks!

This is the addendum to the RPM PDP Charter: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/rpms-charter-addendum-09oct19-en.pdf

This is the latest: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/rpms-charter-addendum-09jan20-en.pdf

Hyperlinked to “revised draft” in the agenda

the voting is for 20th Jan version , https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/rpms-charter-addendum-09jan20-en.pdf

This is the project change request for RPM: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/review-rpm-gtlds-pdp-change-request-17jan20-en.pdf

Can’t see anything from John

We are meeting once a week for 1.5 hours long calls

Ok - can see that

Could we use this meeting transcript as a source of questions for RPM PDP Leadership?

Perhaps a new Índependant'Chair might be an option if all else fails

Michele, what O_o? You and Unparliamentary language? How could this be o_o.

so No Skin in the Game with the Admin Project Mx aspects of the PDP

if we use berry’s average calculations today, it was shared with me earlier today that so far, an average of 5 million dollars would have been spent on this WG

shared with us*

Cheryl - I like the idea of independent chair

Neutrality (and professionalism skill set of Chair(s) is an essential ingredient to success in any model of PDP IMO however so agree with your observations Keith/Michele

Bit for very different reasons from SubPro

@Cheryl - well put

I sincerely hope!!!

that last was not a response to your comment @John ;-) but thanks :-)

Might I venture that with better and more limited scoping and following Work PLans the timelines might be more realistic and less aspirational"

My question is very simple. Results Matter! So, can anyone tell me whether there is any indication that the work product from the WG would meet the objective[s] anticipated? And if we think they will not be met, would it take some courage to kill the process or in good faith allow the 4 months?

Another learning: we need to put the right questions in the charter. Experience from this WG is that unclear charter qs = months of toing & froing as to what the WG is actually supposed to do.

It should have been rechartered

But that horse has bolted

Very true @Marie so a combo of issues from multiple (can do better in future) sources has çaused'some of this snafu

Um, the chartering questions being admittedly substandard and/or not fit to purpose, is it the sense that the work output would then not meet anticipated objective[s]?

ALAC??

http://www.circleid.com/posts/20200123_gnso_council_attend_the_dot_org_protest/

Great that would obviously be preferable

IDN Scoping Team Final Report: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/idn-scoping-team-final-report-17jan20-en.pdf

Thanks Edmon!

Draft response to the NomCom Review Implementation WG: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/draft-council-response-nomcom-outreach-questions-17jan20-en.pdf

Also re deadline of the NCIRWG responses we have already received requests to extend by 2 weeks FYI :-)

Travel pilot: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/fy21-abr-travel-support-request-13jan20-en.pdf

SPS ABR request: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/fy21-abr-strategic-planning-session-request-13jan20-en.pdf

@cheryl but no extension for ATRT pcp :)?

The ABR pot is actually quite small to share ICANN wide

Yup

thanks all and bye !

thanks all

Thanks everyone Bye for now...

Thanks all for a nice first meeting

Thank you all!

Thank you and enjoy the SPS