Logo

Terri Agnew's Personal Meeting Room - Shared screen with speaker view
Michelle DeSmyter
26:24
Will do
Emily Barabas
27:56
ICANN66 schedule: https://66.schedule.icann.org/
karen.lentz
32:06
@Jeff, correct regarding Board role
Jim Prendergast
32:36
How did iii get in there in the first place?
Jim Prendergast
32:44
was it implementation from 2012?
Jim Prendergast
32:46
ok
Justine Chew
34:32
I have the same thought as Jim. (iii) should be subject to recommendations regarding the new appeals mechanism. Perhaps we can say so?
Jamie Baxter | dotgay
34:54
Agree with Jeff that if it remains there is a presumption that the Board may engage in a final decision, when in reality they rubber stamped every decision that came to them.
Justine Chew
36:47
Qualify (iii) subject to recommendations regarding the new appeals mechanism.
Maxim Alzoba
37:32
hello all, sorry for being bit late
Anne Aikman-Scalese
37:48
Me 2
Jamie Baxter | dotgay
47:07
@Jeff .. Did you mean limit the number of auctions, or applications?
Jim Prendergast
48:22
that's much different than limiting applications
Maxim Alzoba
51:20
then there will be a lot of legal entities, which are going to merger after the RA execution
Maxim Alzoba
51:35
I do not see the way to prevent that
Elaine Pruis
51:50
good point
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
52:38
SOme of that was discussed with the new ideas for types of approaches to the way the Auctions ran last round, with the closed bids etc., that were discussed
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
53:33
the Mechanisms of last resort options might be critical here
Maxim Alzoba
53:48
all sides invite best fighters, and the last one e standing prevails :)
Maxim Alzoba
55:30
will have to drop. at the top of the hour, DNS abuse webinar
Jim Prendergast
55:44
call has been shortened to allow for that
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:02:33
QUESTION: Did we look at whether a qualified Applicant Support application should simply WIN a string contention set? QUESTION
Justine Chew
01:04:32
We will be talking about that under private resolution mechanism
Jim Prendergast
01:04:52
thats where putting bids in at application would help solve for that
Jim Prendergast
01:05:08
that was directed to Alan
Justine Chew
01:05:29
My comment was directed to Alan also :)
Maxim Alzoba
01:05:41
@Anne, it will lead to applications to be applied from the underserved regions on sole purpose of winning using this golden key
Maxim Alzoba
01:07:43
though rich communities managed to go through
Justine Chew
01:07:55
I think if sealed bids were to be placed only when contention set is established then the identity of applicants should not be revealed before sealed bids are put in.
Jim Prendergast
01:08:13
bidding against yourself though unless someone bids at 250k and then you lose
Justine Chew
01:10:10
There is a balance to be considered -- having the application fee amount kept reasonably high is one way of discouraging affiliated party applying for same string.
Katrin Ohlmer
01:10:47
+1 Justine
Jim Prendergast
01:11:13
+2
Jim Prendergast
01:11:26
we haven't discussed that
Justine Chew
01:13:16
@Anne, unless applicants which prevail in ASP gets priority like those who win CPE, then ASP qualifiers will still need to participate in auctions if they fall in a contention set. So a multiplier is intended to help such applicants level the playing field against richer applicants.
Michelle DeSmyter
01:13:27
Time check - 10 minutes until the top of the hour
Steve Chan
01:13:31
@Jeff, hand up after the multiplier discussion
Jim Prendergast
01:14:20
does anyone here have any experience with multipliers in other fora? - that experience might be instructive.
Jim Prendergast
01:15:35
we only had Monte respond, correct?
Jim Prendergast
01:16:51
If I recall Monte did like Vickery but as you said, didn't have a solution. May have to look outside the ICANN world. Ill see what the interwebs could come up with.
Justine Chew
01:17:09
+1 Jim
Steve Chan
01:19:04
@Jeff, now that you’re turning back to Vickrey, reminder that my hand is “up”
Elaine Pruis
01:19:56
I think we need a public comment on the timing
Jim Prendergast
01:20:12
I think we need to think/talk through the timing of bids some more. There are some things that bids at application solve that we haven't touched on
Elaine Pruis
01:20:37
since the public hasn’t had an opportunity to consider or discuss
Justine Chew
01:20:56
Identities of parties participating in auctions should not be revealed before sealed bids are put in UNLESS it is necessary to establish which applicants can enjoy a multiplier privilege.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:21:40
Seems a lot more to consider and explore in this topic... More on Thursdays call, Thanks everyone Bye for now...
Alberto Soto
01:22:14
Thanks, bye bye!
Alexander Schubert
01:22:17
bye