Logo

Michelle DeSmyter's Personal Meeting Room - Shared screen with speaker view
Sue Schuler
16:27
Welcome to the meeting of the RA/RAA Amendment Discussion Group with ICANN Staff. Please announce your name before speaking for purposes of the transcript. Please mute your microphone when not speaking to help maintain sound quality. Thanks
Jeff Neuman (RrSG)
18:06
Makes sense to get it all on the calendar
Donna Austin, Neustar
18:11
No objection
Jeff Neuman (RrSG)
22:02
Gotta start somewhere
Karla Hakansson
22:11
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l6fBhHRnnd4e8NoLHCIg6d1AlagDiUwu/edit#heading=h.gjdgxs
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
23:19
no angst
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
23:23
thanks for making that change
Donna Austin, Neustar
24:20
agree with Jim
Russ Weinstein
27:24
correct, the parenthetical is from the February 2019 SLA/Reporting doc.
Russ Weinstein
31:25
Rick, you want to take this? I think it was just a mistake to use “received”
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
31:50
the intent is “responded” for the reason that Jeff is stating
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
33:27
old hand
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
38:26
yes… would like to chime in on this
Jeff Neuman (RrSG)
39:44
I think it applies to the point in which te SLAs become enforceable
Maxim Alzoba
43:15
Is ICANN expects Registries and Registrars to continue development of ‘new’ WHOIS features until the very end?
Maxim Alzoba
45:51
Could it be moved to Spec 4?
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
49:55
yes
Maxim Alzoba
53:17
for whois we have SPEC 4, why not for RDAP?
J.C. Vignes (Uniregistry)
59:59
+1 @Rick
Russ Weinstein
01:03:13
Thanks Rob, good point
J.C. Vignes (Uniregistry)
01:03:24
Many of us have been through a dozen of versions of the AGB, I don’t think we are worried about a 10 pages agreement :)
J.C. Vignes (Uniregistry)
01:03:43
-agreement +annex, sorry
Maxim Alzoba
01:04:50
10 pages is doable
Maxim Alzoba
01:11:29
it was discussed by JC
J.C. Vignes (Uniregistry)
01:13:55
Thanks everyone!