Logo

Julie Bisland's Personal Meeting Room - Shared screen with speaker view
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
21:45
Hello all, I am only on audio
Brian King (IPC)
24:57
that sounds good to me
Margie Milam (BC)
28:18
if we inserted "manual" before balancing test?
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
29:18
I think we need to insert Brians definition of balancing test here, and I disagree with the concept
Matthew Crossman (RySG)
35:01
Just noting that the Bird & Bird memo on Question 3 says "Ensuring data protection obligations are met assists with the balancing but is not determinative (e.g., SSAD ensuring standard contractual clauses in place with requesters regarding adequate protection of data is helpful but not determinative)."
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
38:13
also, in the language on screen now, the opt-out needs to be changed to opt-in
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
41:15
I can live with Beckys suggestion
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
41:25
happy to give it one more shut
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
41:30
shot
Brian King (IPC)
41:34
same here
Brian King (IPC)
43:15
good point, Matthew
Margie Milam (BC)
43:52
agree with the concept
Tatiana Tropina (NCSG)
54:28
yeah I agree it is an interesting observation :-)
Tatiana Tropina (NCSG)
54:56
but this observation rather shows the differences in ccTLDs/gTLDs
Tatiana Tropina (NCSG)
55:15
so yes I agree. As long as we don’t ask this question am happy
Brian King (IPC)
55:37
Thank you. I would like to point this out to the Strawberry team.
Brian King (IPC)
01:00:33
That's the better language I saw earlier. Thanks, Volker.
Brian King (IPC)
01:01:40
I think it's best to be a separate question
Margie Milam (BC)
01:01:45
I'd like to ask it
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:02:01
I agreee, we best separate this out
Matthew Crossman (RySG)
01:02:24
Agreed
Margie Milam (BC)
01:02:49
We'd need to refer to assumptions
Brian King (IPC)
01:02:53
Yes, it can be beefed up
Margie Milam (BC)
01:02:55
with the updated sfeguards
Margie Milam (BC)
01:03:10
I'll do it
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:03:12
as long as no one asks to complete domain lists of privacy services…
Brian King (IPC)
01:03:27
ha Volker
Margie Milam (BC)
01:03:34
thanks!
Matthew Crossman (RySG)
01:03:43
I suggest we specifically define for B&B what we mean by reverse lookups
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:03:55
agreed
Brian King (IPC)
01:04:01
yes
Brian King (IPC)
01:09:04
I agree with Volker
Brian King (IPC)
01:09:20
I would not ask this question
Matthew Crossman (RySG)
01:09:24
Agree with Volker and Brian, let's table this one
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:13:14
I just feel that asking this question is a waste of our resources that we may need down there road
Becky Burr (chair)
01:14:52
Here’s the link to the other case: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/03/technology/facebook-europe.html
Tatiana Tropina (NCSG)
01:16:16
I agree — never supported “let’s re-assess” — unless there are reasons for that
Margie Milam (BC)
01:16:40
Yes- I can try to make the question more specific
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
01:17:19
ok good Margie
Brian King (IPC)
01:17:39
thanks!
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
01:19:31
Thank you Margie and Mathew
Amy Bivins (ICANN org)
01:22:14
I can help with this
Matthew Crossman (RySG)
01:22:59
Happy to
Brian King (IPC)
01:23:54
it was Thomas, but we'll happily take Matthew as well :-)