Logo

Michelle DeSmyter's Personal Meeting Room - Shared screen with speaker view
Graeme Bunton
37:53
Thanks Russ
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
38:40
(hand)
Sue Schuler - RySG Secretariat
42:49
Welcome to the meeting of the RA/RAA Amendment Discussion Group. Please announce your name before speaking for purposes of the transcript. Please mute your microphone when not speaking to help maintain sound quality. Thanks
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
50:09
We spent MANY hours talking about why we needed a longer RT and none of it had to do with the fact that we were or were not running a service in parallel
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
50:50
I can tell you that some were not thrilled at ICANN at accepting that change, but to create an excuse to put back what they initially wanted is poor form
Maxim Alzoba
53:47
technical thresholds should be justified and discussed
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
56:23
+1 Jim
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
57:29
We have a mailing list. We should be using that to discuss issues rather than each side making assumptions and then changes
Maxim Alzoba
58:46
We need to realize that lost of people are going to do lots of ‘new and bright’ things with our RDAP servers (including students ), and it might create abnormal load
Maxim Alzoba
58:57
*lots
James Galvin (Afilias)
59:47
@Jeff, the mailing list is only for CPH at this time. Are you suggesting opening it for us to openly discuss?
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
59:57
It already is open
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
01:00:03
Russ and Karla are on it
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
01:00:16
Thats what we were told on the last call
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:00:25
The sla-reporting list??
Donna Austin, Neustar
01:00:26
Perhaps the comparison is based on 'politics' rather than 'technical', but Rick's point is important.
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
01:00:38
@Jim - That what we were told
Maxim Alzoba
01:00:48
preferably doing sunset after browsers can parse JSON in RDAPs … (CA Browser Forum)
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:01:36
The sunset of WHOIS is not really an issue for registry/registrars in my opinion. It’s really an issue for the client side.
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:02:31
Not sure when it change but fine. I agree with you. Let’s have the detailed discussion there.
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:03:33
My comment about “change” was about the SLA mailing list.
Maxim Alzoba
01:06:22
then it is a material change
Maxim Alzoba
01:06:52
some registrars will have to re-write lots of code
Maxim Alzoba
01:06:56
and it costs
Jeff Neuman (Com Laude)
01:07:50
yes, these are the types of changes that would have to take months to get in place.
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
01:07:57
Ah… I see
Donna Austin, Neustar
01:07:57
It's sounds like we are starting to move away from what we agreed at the start and that was that we were not opening this beyond what has previously been agreed. So lets be careful here.
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
01:08:30
The way that the page broke made it seem like an insertion rather than a reference.
Brian King
01:13:55
Sorry I'm late
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
01:19:43
+1 to what Jim said
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
01:20:37
there should not be a contractual requirement to provide anything other than the RDAP services itself (no GUI requirement)
Russ Weinstein
01:22:36
Apologies, I am in that camp
Maxim Alzoba
01:23:10
by definition RDAP is JSON and not HTTP
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
01:24:50
https://lookup.icann.org/
Maxim Alzoba
01:25:13
new hand
Maxim Alzoba
01:28:06
may i?
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
01:28:29
(I’ll hold my point on the RDAP GUI stuff for later)
Maxim Alzoba
01:29:39
CA Browser Forum - to persuade them to parse JSON
Maxim Alzoba
01:29:46
in browsers
Russ Weinstein
01:30:18
great suggestion Jim & Sue
Brian King
01:30:41
an hour later might be better for Owen and myself if we're on EPDP
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:31:09
An hour later hits the RDAP pilot WGF
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:31:13
WGF -> WG
Maxim Alzoba
01:31:34
bye all
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:31:39
thanks bye all