Yes I am - and thanks
Holly is another CWG veteran so happy to have Holly here!
Apologies for being late
Personally I think format less important than content
I already did 2 mock-ups and have just sent to Ria so she can pull on screen later
I like that idea Naela, as a parallel verification activity it would build confidence in the numbers (In this specific case that’s harder I know)
Just to say that I agree with the view for using the term ccTLD Delegation instead of ccTLD Creation. Delegation to my mind is the more precise term, implying a technical implementation process. Creation could apply to cases where there is a new country e.g. South Sudan or North Macedonia and a new ccTLD code has to be created ...and subsequently delegated.
CWG referred to both as a compromise
CWG used the FOI language with the gTLD language in brackets
Ends 26 july
Nothing from me
ICANN Legal insists they are to in breach of the bylaws ref IFRT I have also argued with them over that.A quick update from myself, I met with the GNSO Council last week, and updated them that my term ends soon. Based on current discussions within council it appears that barring any changes in my availability, I will be reappointed for another term as the non registry liaison. So looking forward to a few more years of service =)
*are not in breach
thanks for clarifying James
I will be there for once
I will not
i wont be there but will as usual be attending remote
but will be in montreal
no plan to update the RYSG at Marrakech. We’ll send the report and wait for questions
Same for Council
Thanks all speak soon :)
Thanks all, see some of you in Marrakesh
Thanks, All. Bye.