I haven’t missed the email calling for volunteers in the RPM charter, right?
Hi Martin, no the email has not gone out
Perfect, just double checking, I will volunteer to that one for obvious reasons
Thanks for the heads up Martin
Just a reminder to all participants — There is an open mic session at the very end of this meeting for comments and questions.
As co-chair of the prior IGO CRP WG, and noting that both co-chairs dissented from Recommendation 5,the new ST will face the same conundrum we did -- how to reconcile the right of judicial review of a UDRP decision that exists for registrants in some national jurisdictions with the judicial immunity of IGOs, the scope of which varies between nationaljurisdictions based upon statute and case law. No easy task.
Thanks Rafik. We did have asks of Council on our slides, but have had no follow up
If anyone is monitoring, could they read that?
Hello from the airport by the way :)
We have brought your comment to the attention to the Council leadership
Safe travel :)
@Jeff taking note of your comment
thanks.....perhaps you can read during open mic?
just so it is officially in the record
I would volunteer but not on council
I think it would be helpful to not have only council
on PDP 3.0 group
If anyone wants my help, I will offer my services. If not, that is fine too :)
To get more information about the PDP 3.0 progress, you are welcome to watch this video: https://youtu.be/0-C1xLR3QOs
<Comment> I think the PDP 3.0 review team should have non Council members as well.
<comment continued> which would include WG Chairs, Former Councilors, etc.
A quick reminder for the format — If you want me to read out loud your question, start your sentence with <QUESTION> and end it with <QUESTION>. If you want me to read out loud your comment, start your sentence with a <COMMENT> and end it with <COMMENT>
<comment 2> Part of the rationale of PDP 2.0 was to not have all work done by Councilors (which is how it was done prior to 2.0. <end>
<Comment> and Marie's and Michele's comments are exactly what the Councilors stated in PDP 1.0
<Comment> People need to research why we went from PDP 1.0 to PDP 2.0>
We are deemed to repeat the problems of the past
I will :)
Now boarding a plane
Thanks everyone for your participation