
35:18
+1 Tara

37:10
No, I think we just tee this up for discussion

37:15
for the plenary

38:38
For the record, we have already forwarded the memo to the plenary, but I can take an action item to provide a summary to include with the chart.

40:10
Technically, the Council "encouraged". It makes sense to do so now while we have funds to use.

40:19
NCSG was the only group that objected.

44:51
I think Brian's approach makes sense

45:24
And to be specific, the Council consider the issue of Accuracy "in-scope". Its a timing issue and desire to complete the final report on SSAD.

45:42
3-part rationale:1. Council's encouragement2. objection based on scope are no longer relevant3. we're merely asking for clarification on previous B&B advice

46:39
I take being referred to as Berry as a compliment.

46:51
I'm sure Berry feels differently :-)

49:08
Note, this version of the Use Cases is the version that MarkSV sent yesterday. The Plenary has yet to react to it yet.

59:07
sorry for joining late

59:12
hi all

01:00:35
+l Brian

01:02:45
Sure, that's a cleaner approach

01:07:43
Yep makes sense to me

01:08:23
Sounds good

01:08:37
Sounds good to me

01:12:20
How did we decide to proceed?

01:12:27
So we have plenary meetings scheduled for 24th and 31st.

01:12:35
Not send any of the I.R. sections to B&B?

01:12:47
Should we try a meeting at this time for the 25th or 1 April?

01:13:07
Else to return to regular schedule will be 7 April.

01:15:02
25th for 1 hour. done.

01:15:32
Will get invite sent out shortly

01:15:39
Thanks all!

01:15:50
Thanks, be well everyone!

01:15:54
Thanks all!