+1 Tara

No, I think we just tee this up for discussion

for the plenary

For the record, we have already forwarded the memo to the plenary, but I can take an action item to provide a summary to include with the chart.

Technically, the Council "encouraged". It makes sense to do so now while we have funds to use.

NCSG was the only group that objected.

I think Brian's approach makes sense

And to be specific, the Council consider the issue of Accuracy "in-scope". Its a timing issue and desire to complete the final report on SSAD.

3-part rationale:1. Council's encouragement2. objection based on scope are no longer relevant3. we're merely asking for clarification on previous B&B advice

I take being referred to as Berry as a compliment.

I'm sure Berry feels differently :-)

Note, this version of the Use Cases is the version that MarkSV sent yesterday. The Plenary has yet to react to it yet.

sorry for joining late

hi all

+l Brian

Sure, that's a cleaner approach

Yep makes sense to me

Sounds good

Sounds good to me

How did we decide to proceed?

So we have plenary meetings scheduled for 24th and 31st.

Not send any of the I.R. sections to B&B?

Should we try a meeting at this time for the 25th or 1 April?

Else to return to regular schedule will be 7 April.

25th for 1 hour. done.

Will get invite sent out shortly

Thanks all!

Thanks, be well everyone!

Thanks all!