Logo

051040031: RySG Meetings - Shared screen with speaker view
Sue Schuler (RySG Secretariat)
26:13
Welcome to the meeting of the RA/RAA Amendment Discussion Group. Please announce your name before speaking for purposes of the transcript. Please mute your microphone when not speaking to help maintain sound quality. Thanks
Sam Demetriou
31:35
Yes
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
31:37
I think so
Jeffrey Neuman
33:08
From end of Ramp up to Transition, yes
Jeffrey Neuman
39:15
It can be chartered under the GNSO if we wanted.
Jeffrey Neuman
39:37
There are non registry/registrar people in it, aren't there?
Maxim Alzoba
41:04
I do not agree with the idea of a WG chartered under GNSO , it will be not so CPH
Brian King (MarkMonitor)
46:17
Similar question came up in EPDP. GNSO GGP or GNSO Standing Committee are worth reviewing as potential anchors.
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
46:35
correct
Maxim Alzoba
48:54
trading months for SLAs is not a good idea
Jeffrey Neuman
49:45
ok - total 18 months
Jeffrey Neuman
49:58
We will bring this up with the Registrars
Jeffrey Neuman
53:03
4,000 is what Registars suggested way back when (before I think Jim added the extra 1000 ms during the small group in Feb 2019
Jeffrey Neuman
53:32
Ashley - I am taking notes on this discussion and can send something around
Ashley Heineman
53:40
Thanks Jeff.
Jeffrey Neuman
53:48
correct
Maxim Alzoba
59:38
real whois is a piece of work
Maxim Alzoba
59:43
not just web interface
Alex Levit
59:58
Depends on the size of the registrar
Alex Levit
01:00:07
Could be a lot of work for a smaller registrar
Alex Levit
01:00:25
So you have to see this as a market barrier / competition issue
Brian King (MarkMonitor)
01:03:26
This seems like a bigger lift now because there aren’t yet a lot of open source resources available. If ICANN committed to make some source code available, or if it was otherwise available, a public web-based client would be perceived as a lighter lift.
Brian King (MarkMonitor)
01:07:50
I agree with Jeff’s suggestion
Brian King (MarkMonitor)
01:08:04
Let’s get some language out of ICANN
Sam Demetriou
01:08:27
Works for me. I think getting some language to review would be a big step forward
Brian King (MarkMonitor)
01:08:35
Also support the Merdinger Doctrine.
J.C.
01:08:56
I think it’s the right approach, and I agree with Jeff that it probably won’t be the last stop so let’s try and move on with the team we are talking to now.
Beth Bacon
01:09:00
I’m still briefing internally but support the direction and next steps. +1 to Sam. I would love to work towards some actual language to comment on
Sue Schuler (RySG Secretariat)
01:09:43
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11ubciWPU5_dTLZrLTfiCqrqSAINu4Mg9NGihgmWzgl4/edit#gid=748303214
Sue Schuler (RySG Secretariat)
01:10:54
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FuKLKkzLAIx_CVgFPA8YhUJtOTRljKWTUdq5HmcLHSM/edit#gid=0
Catherine Merdinger
01:13:32
That sounds like a good plan.
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
01:13:35
sounds good
Beth Bacon
01:13:56
Thanks all
Graeme Bunton (Tucows)
01:13:58
thanks Donna
Ashley Heineman
01:14:00
sounds good. but it is too hot to enjoy this part of summer.
Catherine Merdinger
01:14:00
Thanks everyone!
Brian King (MarkMonitor)
01:14:00
Thanks gang
J.C.
01:14:06
Thanks Team! !
Maxim Alzoba
01:14:13
bye all
Alex Levit
01:14:15
Thanks all :)