Logo

Michelle DeSmyter's Personal Meeting Room - Shared screen with speaker view
Sue Schuler - RySG Secretariat
24:33
Welcome to the meeting of the RDAP WG. Please announce your name before speaking for purposes of the transcript. Please mute your microphone when not speaking to help maintain sound quality. Thanks
Sarah Wyld
28:13
I like the proposed new description, good work :)
Sarah Wyld
30:54
RDAP WG Public Panel session ?
Sarah Wyld
31:49
https://66.schedule.icann.org/meetings/1116868
Sarah Wyld
31:59
There are two different meetings called "Understanding RDAP"
Sarah Wyld
32:05
The link I just posted is the ICANN session
Sarah Wyld
33:39
Oh I like outreach
Sarah Wyld
34:09
https://66.schedule.icann.org/meetings/1116917
Sarah Wyld
34:11
I see it :)
Sarah Wyld
34:19
"GNSO - CPH Understanding RDAP Part 3"
Sarah Wyld
34:31
I just happen to have the calendar open bc I was picking my sessions
Sarah Wyld
35:02
"RDAP WG Public Outreach Session"
James Galvin (Afilias)
35:18
+1
Jody Kolker
35:21
+1
Catherine Merdinger
35:37
Sounds good to me!
Mark Svancarek (marksv)
35:52
cool
Sarah Wyld
36:05
It's like we're professionals!
Catherine Merdinger
36:21
I think it’s birds that molt
Mark Svancarek (marksv)
36:22
lol
James Galvin (Afilias)
36:29
we/re at least scientific
Sarah Wyld
36:38
They definitely do something, though, with turning into butterflies. RDAP butterflies.
Rick Wilhelm (Verisign)
36:48
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1V0qrM__1_Y_69EmcZaiFVw348KW1wF1XiBrVnTNPMaM/edit
Marc Anderson (Verisign / RySG)
38:10
the caterpillar to butterfly change is called a Metamorphosis.
Sarah Wyld
38:23
Oh Marc, that explains why everything feels so Kafkaesque ;)
Justin Mack (MarkMonitor)
38:32
It's like WHOIS formed into a chrysalis and out flew an RDAP butterfly!
Sarah Wyld
38:46
+1 Justin
Sarah Wyld
39:04
Yes - I think whatever we can do to encourage discussion and engagement is a good thing
James Galvin (Afilias)
40:20
wfm
James Galvin (Afilias)
41:40
If we want to *promote* Q&A maybe we need to slightly tweak our description.
Sarah Wyld
41:49
Good point JIm
Sarah Wyld
42:50
+1 we should emphasize discussion and q&a
Sarah Wyld
44:21
Did I just say tha whole thing on mute?
Jody Kolker
44:23
did we lose sarah?
Sarah Wyld
44:23
I really did
Sarah Wyld
44:36
oh interesting
James Galvin (Afilias)
45:46
Something more like: Panel of RDAP WG members who will be available to answer any questions about current experience and the next steps for RDAP and the working group.
James Galvin (Afilias)
46:52
Next steps will include discussion of the impact on RDAP Internet standards.
James Galvin (Afilias)
47:14
+1
James Galvin (Afilias)
49:25
+1
Sarah Wyld
49:42
so, I like 'discussion-focused' to lead the description,
James Galvin (Afilias)
49:56
it’s better when you do all the talking Rick :-)
Mark Svancarek (marksv)
50:11
That's one opinion :-P
Sarah Wyld
53:00
Feel free to dismiss the suggestion, no ego attached, just trying to include the point you made earlier
Mark Svancarek (marksv)
54:44
it's good
Sarah Wyld
54:57
good point :)
Sarah Wyld
55:41
Do we want to say something about encouraging people to bring questions for discussion?
Sarah Wyld
59:52
I think even if there's not precedent we should say that :)
Sarah Wyld
01:00:00
that one was not me
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:00:01
I did that. I have seen that before
Sarah Wyld
01:00:17
No reason why not?
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:00:22
May not work but that’s okay too.
Justin Mack (MarkMonitor)
01:00:26
This session is remotely available, right? remote participants can submit questions?
Sue Schuler - RySG Secretariat
01:00:39
@Justin...…….yes
Mark Svancarek (marksv)
01:01:11
so sensitive
Sarah Wyld
01:01:14
We encourage participants to raise questions for discussion.
Mark Svancarek (marksv)
01:01:34
works for me
Jody Kolker
01:01:41
+1
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:01:59
+1 - delayed by typing
Sue Schuler - RySG Secretariat
01:02:17
good
Sarah Wyld
01:04:43
I already regret volunteering
Sarah Wyld
01:04:44
:)
Sarah Wyld
01:06:47
I can do IRT if no one else wants to
Sarah Wyld
01:15:16
Agreed.
Justin Mack (MarkMonitor)
01:15:26
Agreed to skip 10/31
Sue Schuler - RySG Secretariat
01:15:35
will cancel 10/31
Catherine Merdinger
01:16:02
Good - this meeting would have conflicted with my Halloween seance!
Sarah Wyld
01:16:55
+1 to your priorities, Catherine :)
Justin Mack (MarkMonitor)
01:17:25
Agree skipping 11/21 and 11/28
Catherine Merdinger
01:19:19
That sounds fine with me
Jody Kolker
01:19:22
I'm fine with that at this point.
Sarah Wyld
01:19:43
No preference re November meetings.
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:19:48
+1 to talking on Sunday 11/3
Sarah Wyld
01:20:49
can we coordinate against the epdp schedule so we don't return to an overlapping meeting time?
James Galvin (Afilias)
01:20:57
slight bias for 12pm eastern
Sarah Wyld
01:20:57
oh good point rick
Marc Anderson (Verisign / RySG)
01:21:20
EPDP will stay at 1400 UTC
Marc Anderson (Verisign / RySG)
01:22:36
I don't feel strongly.
Mark Svancarek (marksv)
01:22:39
ok
Sarah Wyld
01:22:40
let's just abolish the time change
Sarah Wyld
01:22:43
and solve the whole thing
Marc Anderson (Verisign / RySG)
01:22:49
+1 Sarah
Sarah Wyld
01:22:58
Thanks team