Welcome to the meeting of the DAAR Discussion Group. Please announce your name before speaking for purposes of the transcript. Please mute your microphone when not speaking to help maintain sound quality. Thanks

Thx Jim, useful clarification

OK - sensible approach

All the spec 13 items were extracted by me from ICANN’s table of approved Spec 13 TLDs

donuts have already reached out. They have done their homework and are waiting for internal approval.

Alan is on the list, he just has a conflict on the calls.

I am late. :( Will do mine shortly.

I missed that

what is the ask here?

we did fill out the spreadsheet for our TLDs

Sorry Richard, just talking about filling out the spreadsheet.

Exactly Jim

right, what isn't filled out from our TLDs? I'm under the impression we did already

that’s an efficient way, let’s get the portfolio operators review and focus on the remaining where we don’t have representation

forgot to lowe rit

Sorry, the cat ate my list :) I’ll do it today, apologies

https://ntldstats.com/tld may give us a clue too

(JC we have the same cat)

@Donna. Yes 100% completion if possible

any with significant volume will probably be type 2

We think the data will be inconclusive otherwise

+1 Martin. I'd err on the side of Type 2.

Can we mark ccTLDs that are part of DAAR and sideline the rest?

This is also why we're being really sensitive to who we share this list with. Why we do not want to, for instance, send it to the ccNSO.

If we establish a viable model/hypothesis, then we'll wrestle with the hard question of how to make it valid.

Martin, yes, we'll need to get that from Samaneh.

Let’s make sure any output shared, even with ourselves is clearly marked with caveats

Yes. Good idea. Jim and I were planning on making sure the email to Samaneh was full of caveats in case the ICANN transparency thing kicks in.

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-2-05feb14-en.pdf

Hmmmmm Kurt. I need to think on that. My brain hurts...

we can check through these - not overly long list

It's too early for existential questions about the Schroedinger TLD? Can be both Category 1 and open?

Thanks jim.