Welcome to the meeting of the DAAR Discussion Group. Please announce your name before speaking for purposes of the transcript. Please mute your microphone when not speaking to help maintain sound quality. Thanks

hello

can you please post the link?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qEsME1KGKXb-Iwn8bTeAqYcQ5r4i9AvB/view?usp=sharing

thx

mhm..the .Versicherung entry is not correct..this was formerly an community application with a strong registration policy

I think that would be interesting to look at

One problem remains: DAAR date is not showing "abuse" - and they did not check für false positives

*DAAR data

The problem is that many people (the « other side ») just stop at the « snapshot »… So making DAAR more comprehensive avoids the issue for most of us?

of course, each of us are free to add more or keep things close to their vests… but saying « people can look past DAAR » is expecting too much of people :)

at least..for some of the so called issues the RO might not the right party to talk to..

+be

Agree with Jim: Rick, we shouldn’t provide our playbook, I agree, because we don’t want to weaken mitigation in the process. But there is a sweet spot between not telling anything and telling everything

I think we should tentatively invite them

and reserve the right to say that we need to work more, if we do?

because their schedule will filled up quickly

the data slicing should be done by then, correct?

I am sorry if this was answered earlier - I had to step away. Are we anticipating an open or closed meeting?

I requested a closed meeting

closed, definitely

I think that is the correct approach

we want to be able to talk about we do or don’t do between ourselves

+1

+1

oops