
24:53
Welcome to the meeting of the DAAR Discussion Group. Please announce your name before speaking for purposes of the transcript. Please mute your microphone when not speaking to help maintain sound quality. Thanks

25:38
hello

26:56
can you please post the link?

27:19
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qEsME1KGKXb-Iwn8bTeAqYcQ5r4i9AvB/view?usp=sharing

27:37
thx

29:34
mhm..the .Versicherung entry is not correct..this was formerly an community application with a strong registration policy

35:42
I think that would be interesting to look at

35:42
One problem remains: DAAR date is not showing "abuse" - and they did not check für false positives

36:06
*DAAR data

48:55
The problem is that many people (the « other side ») just stop at the « snapshot »… So making DAAR more comprehensive avoids the issue for most of us?

49:42
of course, each of us are free to add more or keep things close to their vests… but saying « people can look past DAAR » is expecting too much of people :)

51:00
at least..for some of the so called issues the RO might not the right party to talk to..

51:13
+be

56:58
Agree with Jim: Rick, we shouldn’t provide our playbook, I agree, because we don’t want to weaken mitigation in the process. But there is a sweet spot between not telling anything and telling everything

01:01:17
I think we should tentatively invite them

01:01:28
and reserve the right to say that we need to work more, if we do?

01:01:43
because their schedule will filled up quickly

01:01:48
the data slicing should be done by then, correct?

01:03:44
I am sorry if this was answered earlier - I had to step away. Are we anticipating an open or closed meeting?

01:04:42
I requested a closed meeting

01:04:55
closed, definitely

01:05:02
I think that is the correct approach

01:05:10
we want to be able to talk about we do or don’t do between ourselves

01:05:14
+1

01:05:24
+1

01:05:49
oops