Logo

Terri Agnew's Personal Meeting Room
Julie Bisland
34:00
Welcome to the CCWG New gTLD Auction Proceeds call on Wednesday, 25 March 2020 at 14:00 UTC.
Danko Jevtović iPad
34:10
hi all
Vanda Scartezini
37:56
it is done already
Judith Hellerstein
38:26
what is done
Emily Barabas
46:36
I think Sam’s interpretation is correct
Emily Barabas
46:51
There may have been an issue with the formulation of the question
sarahdeutsch
47:17
Agree - the Board should probably not have been referenced
Stephen Deerhake
48:05
Alan, the unmute issue makes for better Bingo! ;-)
Judith Hellerstein
48:37
Alan if you use the audio from computer or tablet you only have to unmute in one place
Anne Aikman-Scalese
49:07
THe confusing language is "including the approval of allocation of auction proceeds" - allocation is normally a budget term and we have to clarify that EC powers are not diminished as to the overall Budget item
Vanda Scartezini
49:53
I agree with Sam point
Alan Greenberg
50:18
@Judith, I use the phone and normally mute locally. Sometimes there is interference from the phone line itself and I get muted in Zoom.
Anne Aikman-Scalese
50:25
THank you Erika
Joke Braeken
50:52
there is a MAC-shortcut to unmute: [COMMAND] [SHIFT] [A]
Xavier
51:03
Hello. I am on another call at this time. Will attempt to follow the chat.
Alan Greenberg
51:30
On a PC, it is ALT-A
Sam Eisner
53:42
Reconsideration is staff and Board
Vanda Scartezini
53:56
I have the same view as legal response express
Sam Eisner
54:09
IRP does not extend to contractors. It is about whether ICANN followed its Bylaws/Mission
Alan Greenberg
55:40
@Sam, is that clear? Normally you cannot absolve yourself of responsibilities by sub-contracting.
Sam Eisner
56:31
@Alan, if ICANN improperly relies on actions taken by a subcontractor, then you challenge ICANN’s action, not the subcontractor’s action
Emily Barabas
56:59
I don’t believe there is currently language in the proposed Final Report addressing the Empowered Community
Anne Aikman-Scalese
57:07
+1 Sam
Emily Barabas
57:21
This may be something that the leadership team needs to take back and propose language to include
Alan Greenberg
59:01
Agreed Sam. That was exactly the motive. Our concern was that the accountability measures might not be a reasonable way to mitigate grant refusals, but that alone would not necessarily stop someone from trying!
Vanda Scartezini
59:19
will be good if Sam come with more clear words
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:00:52
that is what we need to clarify - that EC overall budget powers are not limited
Emily Barabas
01:02:44
Sorry, Erika, I wrote that before Sam spoke
Alan Greenberg
01:04:59
Remember the other item.
Sam Eisner
01:09:38
We’d want to coordinate with Xavier on any language that addresses specific budget items
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:10:16
Suggest "For the sake of clarity, the recommended ByLaws amendment is not intended to affect the powers of the EC over the overall Budget as expressed in the current ByLaws".
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:14:53
Thank you.
vandascartezini
01:15:35
thanks Erika
Sam Eisner
01:15:37
@Anne, we probably want to make it a bit broader to reflect that the EC powers are broader than just over the budget, but I think that your language is a good starting point
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:15:59
Thanks Sam
Alan Greenberg
01:19:28
Do we really need to be reviewing the polite intros to each comment??
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:20:30
Agree with Leadership recommendation
Carolina Caeiro
01:20:45
+ 1 with leadership rec
Judith Hellerstein
01:21:19
i agree with Alan
vandascartezini
01:23:04
i raise the green signal..
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:25:33
Looks fine as to timeline barring other force majeure issues
Julf Helsingius
01:26:05
Thank you everyone, and stay safe!
Carolina Caeiro
01:26:09
thanks everyone!
sarahdeutsch
01:26:14
Thanks everyone —stay well!
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:26:14
THank you ERika Emily et al
vandascartezini
01:26:18
stay health and safe inside home for while
Rudi Daniel
01:26:24
thank you so much all. stay safe
Judith Hellerstein
01:26:27
thanks erika
Rudi Daniel
01:26:37
byr