Logo

New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Webinar - Shared screen with speaker view
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
26:22
In Webinar mode @Christopher you as a participant won't see that list, However we currently have 66 people attending
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
26:31
I will keep ypu all updated on attendees
Nathalie Peregrine
27:16
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.
Terri Agnew
27:17
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
27:18
82 ateendee
Terri Agnew
27:49
Slides can be found on the GNSO Calendar or wiki agenda pageWelcome to those who joined late. All attendees will be on mute until the Q&A session.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
28:04
90 now welcome all!
Terri Agnew
28:07
GNSO calendar: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#sep
Terri Agnew
28:20
Agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/DwC-C
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
28:20
feel free to use the Qand A pod as we gothrough
Danko Jevtović
28:29
Hi *.*
Terri Agnew
29:37
@all: to ensure everyone can see your chat messages, please change the dropdown to include All Panelists and Attendees.
Javier Rúa-Jovet
30:10
Hello 2 @all! Hola a tod@s!!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
30:18
any simple things in QandA we will also attempt to answer as we go in the pod
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
30:54
we now have more than 104 attendees FYI so please you can all join us today
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
34:37
115 attendees at this time
Javier Rúa-Jovet
34:50
Great attendance!!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
35:30
Note FINALISATION by EOY!!!
Michele Neylon (Blacknight)
38:25
Which year? :)
Michele Neylon (Blacknight)
38:30
/me ducks
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
38:37
120 now @Vanda excellent, and reflective of the importance of the topic
Vanda Scartezini
39:02
@cheryl. great!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
45:13
note Äs Implamented"on that Status Quo reference
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
45:44
"As Implemented" typos SIGG
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
48:50
We do recommend that in prep for filling out the Form you use a Word Doc to prepare, this will also help where group inputs are being created
Michele Neylon (Blacknight)
49:48
Is there a separate doc with all the questions?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
50:26
we have a PDF and Word option yes
Michele Neylon (Blacknight)
50:32
Grand
Michele Neylon (Blacknight)
50:40
perfect
Steve Chan
50:45
@Michele, yes. You can find in Section III here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-report-2020-08-20-en
Amr Elsadr
50:50
A problem I’ve experienced when trying to read comments submitted via the google form, is that they are displayed in a spreadsheet in which the text in each cell isn’t properly wrapped. Generally, the interface makes it difficult to read submitted comments, but in some cases, the responses to questions aren’t fully displayed.
Amr Elsadr
51:35
Any potential fix for this?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
52:08
Noted @Amr, but of course before WG Analysis of PC we will ensure that all data is fully readable and shown n the Staff Report
Amr Elsadr
52:21
Thanks, Cheryl.
Paul McGrady
59:08
@Jeff, when you say "we are recommending this" or "we are recommending that", do you mean that the consensus call on all of these things has already been taken?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
59:33
@Paul @Jeff specifically covered that earlier
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
59:46
But No we have NOT taken any Consensus call at this stage
Paul McGrady
59:55
@CLO, thanks. I joined late.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:00:24
Ahh NP I always expect you to be with us @Paul
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:02:36
QUESTION: Given that the Draft Final Report is 361 pages, is the length of the public comment period realistic? QUESTION
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:04:52
@Anne, we recognose that if it was a 'go read allthat then formulate opinion write feedback and lodge it'exercise it would be a push for some (especially groups with the associated group dynamics) But we have gone to great lengths to ensure that the reference to the specifics of recommendations etc., substantial changes from previous Reports etc., is called out and linked to the Form and of course the PC Form also makes the input itself as easy as we can make it to assist in it not being unrealistic
Paul McGrady
01:11:25
Are there any rules against another applicant helping an applicant who doesn't get applicant support? Coulda competitor try to keep another competitor in a contention set...
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:12:56
@Paul can I ask you to copy that one into the Qand A Pod (I am unable to) as I would like to come back to that one at the end of the presentation in general QandA
Paul McGrady
01:13:52
Done. Thanks!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:13:55
Thx @Paul
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:14:41
I've marked it for "live Answer"/discussion
Alan Greenberg
01:16:53
The fact that the "g" in gTLD stands for "Generic" does not help this discussion!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:19:37
indeed @Alan
Alan Greenberg
01:22:32
None of the proposals will likely be adopted by the WG, but the principals are indeed the issue that we need to focus on.
Terri Agnew
01:24:46
@all: to ensure everyone can see your chat messages, please change the dropdown to include All Panelists and Attendees.
Maxim Alzoba
01:25:10
an applicant - not a registry yet
Annebeth Lange
01:26:17
@Alan, I agree
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:30:00
the logest one @Jeff ;-)
Paul McGrady
01:34:18
Mr. Even Keel. You are doing great Jeff.
Terri Agnew
01:38:15
To ask a question, click the Q&A box and type in your question at bottom of your zoom screen or you may also raise your hand.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:39:57
If you raise your hand Terri will unmute you but you may also need to unmute yourself
Vanda Scartezini
01:40:48
we have provided support to competitors here in Brazil and all got it approved but int he end we as group decided not apply by we own.
Tom Barrett - EnCirca
01:41:45
I asked a question in the Q&A
Alan Greenberg
01:42:15
Jeff, thanks for this concise and helpful summary of this emmense tome (ot tomb??) and within the time frame!
Alan Greenberg
01:42:24
ot = or
Vanda Scartezini
01:43:27
certainly the question needed to be answered
Vanda Scartezini
01:44:27
some back end providers give some good answers to those not able to understand all the technical process
Janvier Ngnoulaye (University of Yaounde 1)
01:44:49
@Jeff, Thank you for the presentation.
Paul McGrady
01:45:11
I think the preapproval process is one of the really big improvements coming out of this PDP.
Elaine Pruis
01:49:09
we called it the RSP Pre-evaluation process. so Pre-evaluated. Not Pre-approved.
Elaine Pruis
01:49:47
not pre-approved. pre-evaluated.
Tom Barrett - EnCirca
01:50:00
I agree Paul. It would be nice if applicants could therefore defer the selection of their back-end provider until required for the testing phase.
Maxim Alzoba
01:51:04
technical answers identify a backend well
Elaine Pruis
01:51:21
thanks
George Sadowsky
01:52:16
Jeff, Thanks for a very articulate, balanced, understandable, and appropriately nuanced presentation of a major piece of work.
Vanda Scartezini
01:53:01
indeed george very good thank you Jeff
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:53:27
We need to end the que now
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:53:56
Any other questions can be sent and we will respond after the webionar
Paul McGrady
01:54:12
+1 Christopher. Seems like the only ,brands who will apply are the ones that are 100% confident that they can win the sealed bid auctions. By filing, you have to play ICANN's game, rather than just suing an applicant trying to squat on your mark.
Louis Houle
01:54:24
@Jeff: Great job, thanks!
Paul McGrady
01:54:35
WG needs to fix this anti-brand bias before the final report comes out.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:55:19
Start drafting @Paul
Paul McGrady
01:56:11
@CLO - the good news is that it is an easy fix. Simply exempt .brands from the sealed bids process and let them use the ascending bid process like last time.
Statton Hammock
01:56:27
Jeff - This is all very well done. Thanks for walking us through this Report. Very helpful. Congrats to all WG members on this effort.
Philippe Fouquart
01:56:37
(thanks Jeff, and thanks Cheryl) needless to say that that 35.3 a read tough one to ecxercise.
Tom Barrett - EnCirca
01:57:09
Applicants should able to defer the selection of their technical service providers, including back-end registry providers, until pre-delegation testing.
Terri Agnew
01:57:20
Slides and recordings can be found on the GNSO Calendar and wiki agenda pagehttps://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#sep and https://community.icann.org/x/DwC-C
Tom Barrett - EnCirca
01:57:26
+1. Great job Jeff!
Philippe Fouquart
01:57:26
+1 to Alan's note
Javier Rúa-Jovet
01:57:49
Many, many, many thanks due to Co-chairs @Jeff & @CLO for this great, detailed refresher call. And some great Q & A !
Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong
01:58:00
thanks great webinar
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:58:03
Thanks everyone!!! Bye for now
Manal Ismail
01:58:07
Great job Jeff and Cheryl .. Million thanks !!
Vanda Scartezini
01:58:08
thanks again!
Maxim Alzoba
01:58:11
bye all