Good evening

Was the survey data also completed by information about the volume of historical pre-GDPR WHOIS queries?

*complemented (not completed)

Before GDPR forced less access to data there where no request necessary.

@Brian, are you asking whether we inquired of survey respondents how many times they accessed WHOIS for data?

Right but there were queries, for which presumably data on that volume exists (or can be gathered from eg vendors).

Annual Operations - is it intention that fees will cover such?

Nigel, according to the PDP, all cost should be covered by the users. So yes.

The intent of GDPR was to restrict access to this data so what was possible before is not possible now.

Sharing the link to the webinar that was held in November; https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/KnohM9ysEYc5fYdC1z_MkV9cdhuH2on_xaXPltyCDPwJLwBTh_VzCF1phgTc4ZpIWJw82srB3VLaKOmf.MKLsMSb8zcWmX9mD?continueMode=trueand here’s a link to the blog summarizing the webinar - that includes the above link: https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/new-icann-webinar-available-an-ssad-odp-update-on-the-business-process-design-22-11-2021-en

@Goran - thanks

Maybe a small reminder: Personal dataPersonal data is any information which could be used on its own or combined with other information from within the police service or public domain to identify a living person.Examples include: a person’s name, address, phone number, email address, IP address, photograph or video recording.If a person cannot be identified then data protection legislation does not apply. Anonymisation is a means of converting personal data into a form in which the individuals concerned are no longer identifiable – this is classed as anonymised data.

This is why some information in the WHOIS system is not available easily.

what does it mean "some predictability forresponse times"? "some"?

@Viacheslav, the recommendations in the Final Report did not set any SLAs for the CPs to actually disclose the data once the decision was made. Thus, predictability stops at the time of decision making.

@Yuko; thanks for a clear overview.

or in other words "maximum allowable response time"?

@Viacheslav, I’m not sure what you mean. Are you asking if the Final Report had any maximum “allowable response time” that include CP’s disclosure from the time of request being submitted?

I'm asking how to understand statement in presentation "some predictability forresponse times" Now we discuss presentation, not report

@Viacheslav, the Final Report had some response time requirements set forth in the recommendations, thus the user can benefit from knowing how long each process/step may take within the SSAD.

On NIS2, I think - unless am mistaken - that legally it could amend provisions of GDPR depending on will of Council and EP. But of course defer to EU Commission.

Thank you for the presentation. What are the next steps?

Goran, colleagues thank you for response and update!

Register for ICANN's Next SSAD ODP Project Update WebinarThe ICANN will host a webinar on Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 1500 UTC to provide the community with an update on the System for Standardized Access/Disclosure (SSAD) Operational Design Phase.

It was a pleasure

Thank you for inviting us!

Thank you for discussion, very useful.

And a good discussion Brian

Thanks everyone bye

The webinar will be presented in English with interpretation in Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish available through the Adigo dial-in line. Video and audio recordings will be published on the SSAD ODP webpage [r20.rs6.net].https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=00162zPvPuq2qeSjPt82NrOK3h0lR8yYlhOo3l6Xqz9onXdINxl63Uadol-S4k3eLPJ_7lRqsPz0oJHPi6gmb_cJ3VoOHvCSn5e84f4ZNYNdqls3cq00Wfcrf4KLfKYFVc4mR-m0SSVM0G20HaWHY7mvtqSIYd-dbC-m69xxfEiQks5U2YwntjOI0vtkmsTAAJvStAM5iHVsr8=&c=zRFYzo7TFGrvsL6ijsYYoeXJkjjAjeTK0s9otwwTafJXd_7lXbKZ9g==&ch=MSynh3gmdiKf_pU3INg7pLvpAKc7G75ECtNOzS23kaFdUtmrYjiuGw==__;!!PtGJab4!qzvufELENYkTlhM69rMMTSL5B9MonTAN2Rntq1-zeMjTmZGfLcki3mfQcBOQNEIzEH261NQ$