Hello all, sorry I’m late. It seems I’m just at the start.

Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en

Welcome, Osvaldo!

Hello All, sorry for being bit late

+1

Good news Raymond - I hope it stays that way!

I am afraid the selection qualifications is limited to the Call for volunteers letter (if there is no situation of two or more equally qualified candidates)

I think he has all the qualities and experience required for the role.

He's certainly one of the most recognisable faces in ICANN.

I think the same, it is not about recognition, but about actual participation

Ex-officio here. If Milton with his experience in IANA transition and years at ICANN is not qualified for this role, I don’t know who is.

But it should be more about - do we think he knows enough about the CSC and the entire transition to be involved and effective.

Cross-posted Tanya.

Marie, exactly. He was a member of the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group and he was actually one of those who designed the transition and post transition ICANN. Just a note..

I think he has all the required qualifications.

I am not supposed to be involved in the decision making but hope I can still comment — if anybody is not okay with this, let me know

Yes. He is very qualified

And he is the only candidate, so I don’t see any need for a discussion. Unless someone has an objection to him.

+1 @Osvaldo

+1 Osvaldo.

@Tatiana +1

+1 Osvaldo

Could we send e-mail to SSC list of who supports/objects (2 days or so timeframe)?

I am actually amazed that he is still willing to serve especially because it’s the only application. It’s really sad that we are losing the number of potential volunteers but happy that Milton applied

Jothan agreed in advance via e-mail

That is my concern @Tatiana

We do support (I am typing it as RySG rep.)

Hand up

48 hours

usually

might br 72 though :) but I do not insist on the latter

How many EOI have we gotten so far?

do we have any EOI?

EOIs

it clearly shows (the situation where few positions already were filled by the single applicant) the burnout of the community

I think we should send our concerns as a separate letter to GNSO Council (optional)

Think as you also said Carlton, it cold be (here) an indicator of no F2F meetings.

*could

at least to note that few items were filled with the single applicant

also the same was for GAC liaison

+1 Marie

Ex officially welcomed, Tanya ;-).

Perhaps individual SSC members could relay the message to the groups they represent?

I think all who have been participating in ICANN in the last years are aware of the problem of candidates burn out, now with COVID 19 the problem has grown. Working from home is very requiring on our time.

As Tanya is saying

I think various constituency Leaders should just make it a point to regularly remind people to volunteer for roles.

Well said Tanya

Done that, Emily.

we might have it on record

GNSO might need to be strategic about the volunteers burnout. Each stakeholder need to work on that.

Absolutely I will

+1 @Sophie

and we might take that offline to save time

Thanks Tanya

You are welcome Mary.

Hand up

And sorry for the background noise on my side. My son is home sick today.

I thought SSC is about selection, not appointment

OK - so who is on the CRG?

it seems to be job for SGs Leadership teams

(And - yay, a new acronym ;-))

soon we will use all 3 letter abbreviations

in RySG we are directed, so I will need guidance from the SG

Confused. As usual. So is SSC going to appoint people to the CRG, and then the CRG will choose the IRP panellists - right?

https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-11-18-en

No - it's not you, it's me!!

Very clear now. Thanks Mary

We need to have materials and time

Can you tell us who the one GNSO candidate is?

it is quite hard to make a selection without info :) we have not developed our fortunetelling to the required level yet

Can GNSO develop some materials for us to use?

I think we might ask to extend the deadline for a week more (maybe we have one more?)

@Tatiana, it adds one item to the issue of burnout (one candidate for two seats)

Can Mary brief us on the skills needed for the role?

Great

we might need materials at least offline (in e-mail)

Yes.

could we take it offline

thanks all

What about asking SGs and Cs to nominate more candidates before we can review

Thank you all. Good discussions

need to join the SubPro call right in a few minutes

Thanks Carlton & all!

Thanks all