
32:58
Hello all, sorry I’m late. It seems I’m just at the start.

33:16
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en

33:26
Welcome, Osvaldo!

33:51
Hello All, sorry for being bit late

34:12
+1

34:13
Good news Raymond - I hope it stays that way!

42:31
I am afraid the selection qualifications is limited to the Call for volunteers letter (if there is no situation of two or more equally qualified candidates)

44:35
I think he has all the qualities and experience required for the role.

46:45
He's certainly one of the most recognisable faces in ICANN.

47:10
I think the same, it is not about recognition, but about actual participation

47:20
Ex-officio here. If Milton with his experience in IANA transition and years at ICANN is not qualified for this role, I don’t know who is.

47:28
But it should be more about - do we think he knows enough about the CSC and the entire transition to be involved and effective.

47:41
Cross-posted Tanya.

48:45
Marie, exactly. He was a member of the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group and he was actually one of those who designed the transition and post transition ICANN. Just a note..

49:13
I think he has all the required qualifications.

49:53
I am not supposed to be involved in the decision making but hope I can still comment — if anybody is not okay with this, let me know

50:01
Yes. He is very qualified

50:05
And he is the only candidate, so I don’t see any need for a discussion. Unless someone has an objection to him.

50:18
+1 @Osvaldo

50:38
+1 Osvaldo.

50:39
@Tatiana +1

50:49
+1 Osvaldo

50:59
Could we send e-mail to SSC list of who supports/objects (2 days or so timeframe)?

51:03
I am actually amazed that he is still willing to serve especially because it’s the only application. It’s really sad that we are losing the number of potential volunteers but happy that Milton applied

51:13
Jothan agreed in advance via e-mail

51:36
That is my concern @Tatiana

51:37
We do support (I am typing it as RySG rep.)

51:50
Hand up

52:28
48 hours

52:31
usually

52:49
might br 72 though :) but I do not insist on the latter

55:20
How many EOI have we gotten so far?

57:03
do we have any EOI?

57:07
EOIs

57:56
it clearly shows (the situation where few positions already were filled by the single applicant) the burnout of the community

59:21
I think we should send our concerns as a separate letter to GNSO Council (optional)

59:57
Think as you also said Carlton, it cold be (here) an indicator of no F2F meetings.

01:00:06
*could

01:00:07
at least to note that few items were filled with the single applicant

01:00:22
also the same was for GAC liaison

01:02:30
+1 Marie

01:03:28
Ex officially welcomed, Tanya ;-).

01:04:11
Perhaps individual SSC members could relay the message to the groups they represent?

01:04:17
I think all who have been participating in ICANN in the last years are aware of the problem of candidates burn out, now with COVID 19 the problem has grown. Working from home is very requiring on our time.

01:04:21
As Tanya is saying

01:04:22
I think various constituency Leaders should just make it a point to regularly remind people to volunteer for roles.

01:04:25
Well said Tanya

01:04:32
Done that, Emily.

01:05:00
we might have it on record

01:07:19
GNSO might need to be strategic about the volunteers burnout. Each stakeholder need to work on that.

01:07:23
Absolutely I will

01:07:29
+1 @Sophie

01:08:13
and we might take that offline to save time

01:09:34
Thanks Tanya

01:09:35
You are welcome Mary.

01:10:36
Hand up

01:12:49
And sorry for the background noise on my side. My son is home sick today.

01:15:47
I thought SSC is about selection, not appointment

01:16:10
OK - so who is on the CRG?

01:16:35
it seems to be job for SGs Leadership teams

01:16:48
(And - yay, a new acronym ;-))

01:17:05
soon we will use all 3 letter abbreviations

01:18:52
in RySG we are directed, so I will need guidance from the SG

01:19:09
Confused. As usual. So is SSC going to appoint people to the CRG, and then the CRG will choose the IRP panellists - right?

01:19:09
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-11-18-en

01:21:45
No - it's not you, it's me!!

01:22:12
Very clear now. Thanks Mary

01:22:31
We need to have materials and time

01:22:48
Can you tell us who the one GNSO candidate is?

01:23:31
it is quite hard to make a selection without info :) we have not developed our fortunetelling to the required level yet

01:24:44
Can GNSO develop some materials for us to use?

01:25:14
I think we might ask to extend the deadline for a week more (maybe we have one more?)

01:26:09
@Tatiana, it adds one item to the issue of burnout (one candidate for two seats)

01:26:20
Can Mary brief us on the skills needed for the role?

01:27:00
Great

01:27:11
we might need materials at least offline (in e-mail)

01:28:15
Yes.

01:28:38
could we take it offline

01:28:42
thanks all

01:28:57
What about asking SGs and Cs to nominate more candidates before we can review

01:29:02
Thank you all. Good discussions

01:29:07
need to join the SubPro call right in a few minutes

01:29:18
Thanks Carlton & all!

01:29:22
Thanks all