The MPC is the ccNSO Meetings Programme Committee. Barbara chairs this committee

works fine

I preferred the time bound nature of KL, hated the three weeks of Hamburg. but I did like

*did like the full set of sessions at Hamburg. in the poll I voted Hamburg cos of sessions.

I concur with Jordan

I share Jordan's view.

I’m happy to take a week out and live in a hotel like a hermit... but not for two weeks

i didnt get the option

I also didn’t see the option

@Jordan +1

@Desiree and @Fernando, we were asked to use the green tick or the red cross

You can find the green/red tick buttons in the zoom tool bar, where you can also raise your hand.

@alejandra @joke - thanks

I just don’t mind much about public schedule or not, I don’t really care either way

being visible seems like a good idea broadly

The full document by ICANN org with the proposed recommendations: https://ccnso.icann.org/en/workinggroups/community-consultation-icann-public-meetings-strategic-changes-11dec20-en.pdf

in person I would be very likely. but online the best thing you can do is get content, really

so online, with no ccnso, not likely

+1 Jordan

I am sire, that evan in virtual heeting we can share our experience

I just don’t really like online networking events

way more difficult than in a real room with real faces

no real interactions

but we have not chance to meet face to face, we can alsi ise this way, isn’t it?

But they did not refer to ccNSO sessions I guess, because they were not on the public schedule

Agree with Barbara.

The proposed draft block schedule only includes plenary sessions and public forum

I strongly believe that training should be available to volunteers who will be chairing sessions

Agree Pablo. That is also why the MPC is investing so much time in prep sessions and dry runs

Pablo, the ICANN leadership academy had a webinar last week to address chairing skills. thought it is not anywhere near the face to face session, but it was quite informative

Thanks all for a good and informative session. I leave for my next meeting. Happy holidays, mince pies, etc 🎄

Happy holidays Desiree :)

One but last question :) one final question remains

I don’t see a reason to change

we have to remain globally accessible and the time rotations is a part of that

options 1 and 2 are ok. the rest are not acceptable if we want to claim to be global

actually that’s a great point Alejandra

I think that the organizing session during a limited period of time with 31% pain for all will be the best solution

I don’t Anna because it will never be in a time that suits our region - it will always end up being for North America and Europe

The final poll for today

This is multiple choice

unfortunately I must agree with you, Jordan…

Strongly share Stephen view

maybe regional meetings could just be replaced by icann supporting RO meetings once a year, once travel begins?

maybe not

interesting idea

good discussion today thanks Bart

This was very informative and productive.

Thank you, Bart, we rally nerd to think about the conditions and the best solutions. Very helpful discussion

The deadline for comments is 17 December (23:59 UTC)

Thank you Barbara, Joke, and Bart!

thanks Barbara too and Joke, nice to see you all!

Well done Bart and Barbara.

Most welcome! Many thanks for attending and providing your input. Bye all.

oh sorry : we really need to think about the conditions and the best solutions. Typo:(