Also includes suggested changes from Griffin

Note (1) incorporates Griffin’s proposed edit as follows: (1) mandatory RPMs should only be for trademarks, not other source designations that do not function as trademarks, including Geographical Indications;

The above doesn’t include my changes, FYI

Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en

(The original pasted text_

Pinch yourself, Phil ;)

@Griffin - the google doc has been revised to incorporate your edits

I see that, was just noting that what was initially pasted above doesn’t, in case people were looking at that

Applause, thanks and cheers!!

And former Council Liaison! :-)

Correct Griffin - c/p text was outdated

A huge thanks to Phil, Kathy and Brian

@Phil -- But I will miss (until Part Deux) our community.

and our former council liaison, Paul :)

And to John McElwaine and Paul McGrady as our two liaisons to Council!

+1 John -- Kudos to the cat herders!

+1. and wow - can you believe we are nearly done!!

Can’t believe it’s been 4.5+ years since our first call. Thanks to all of our determined leaders and contributors! It’s been a long, long road.

Tx you to Staff for the edits

hahaha!

LoL

hahahah

https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-24oct19-en.pdf

@Steve — I think we probably ALL should be committed. ;-)

hand up

Yes, Michael. We’re all far more dedicated and determined than good sense would warrant.

This footnote (on Consensus Against) was added for clarity after a previous PDP group ended up in this position. Staff does not see it as an issue arising in this RPM PDP.

Thanks Mary, and agreed

This footnote (on Consensus) can be contrasted, for example, in the ICANN context with “GAC Consensus”, which uses the international law custom instead.

Hi All. Sorry to be late.

Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Peace.

Quick note that we will not be holding meetings during this 10 day period.

If necessary, a meeting can be scheduled on 12 November, as Phil notes.

Hi. INTA Annual Meeting is that week. I cannot meet. Some of our members may not be able to meet as well.

When do we expect to start Phase II?

@Phil: That’s correct.

Quick note that Nov. 12 is a Thursday.

@Kathy: Correct. If needed we would use this 17:00 UTC time slot on that Thursday.

Tx Julie!

Please post here what you will be doing with your extra 3 hours per week.

Is that when the rechartering starts Q1 2021? Or in December?

I'm going to learn to play the harmonica.

@Paul - catching up with Netflix binge watching.

@Paul - or finally take my German B1 exam. ;)

Is there an alumni association for this WG?

@Paul, learn the harmonica part to Piano Man and we’ll jam at the next in-person meeting!

@Zak - there is a 12 step program for this group.

when do you expect the email to issue and start the ten day period? I missed that if it was said.

HA!

@Lori, the GNSO Council has not determined when it will begin the rechartering process, but it is definitely on their action radar which lists items by month/quarter/further out.

@David, staff will send out the email after this call, we expect no later than tomorrow.

@Mary - thanks. I think rechartering is going to be crucial.

Thanks Mary

"This was horrible. It took too long and ate up so much of my life. When does the next one start?" - anonymous

I'm not here for the BC Phil - I'm here for AIM.

Really - I am NOT here for the BC - no more than Zak is! Thanks for that though.

if I am not mistaken we are not using representative model of a WG

@Maxim: That is correct.

@Paul — Is that a member of Working Group Participants Anonymous you are quoting?

@Paul: Tomorrow.

Basically, it isn’t about counting heads but it also isn’t about marginalizing members based on whether they are representing themselves, an organization or an ICANN community group. As Julie notes, that is up to the co-chairs and is not so much a science as it is a process that allows for flexibility.

having 10 days when a usual reaction of SG is 14 is not good

A special thanks to ICANN Staff for all of their help and dedication throughout this long process!

What a slog...but we did it.

+1 @ Steve

Big thanks to Staff, Kathy, Phil and Brian. What an enormous amount of work. Congrats and well done to all of you.

Amen!

Thanks all - good feeling to be done with our final WG meeting after all this time. Let’s hope for a smooth consensus call.

@Maxim, the assumption is that any member representing a group will have been consulting and reporting back throughout the process, especially considering how extensive the Working Group’s discussions of each recommendation have been.

Thanks Kathy, Brian & Phil.

Many thanks to chairs, staff, and colleagues for this long and involved work.

A virtual toast to all!

thanks all

& thanks to staff as well

Huge thanks to Staff for tremendous efforts, writing and editing!

Unfortunately, there isn’t a tradition of a reception for each PDP group when it completes its work - but the Council resolution on the outcomes will always thank the group!

Yes, thank you all, and thanks Kathy. it would be nice to get back to an in person ICANN to celebrate the close of this WG.

I'll buy the first round at the next in-person meeting!

Traditions have to be created sometime, Mary ;-).

Thanks to staff and everyone for this effort

Thanks very much to the Co-Chairs and thanks to everyone’s hard work

Thank you!

Thank you. Ciao!

Thanks, all

K thx bye

lol

Thanks everyone a lot of work bye all

bye all

Tx Phil!!

Special thanks to staff.

Bye all! And thanks for all the fish.