
18:52
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en**Members: reminder, when using chat, please select all panelists and attendees in order for everyone to see chat.

24:57
Let’s not use the anonymous term

25:14
As a reminder, please just chat to panelist and attendees so all chats can be capture.

25:24
**adjust chat

26:00
Agreed

26:43
I find it hard to imagine a persistent pseudonymized email that is the same across all domains, as remaining opaque. You know one, you know them all.

26:51
Definitions doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vofZIqnY-xCaKMte1q_tiAwAfGwkwsu1/edit

28:15
Registrars not registries, correct?

29:44
That’s a policy argument to be had in the plenary

30:20
I agree that it needs to go to plenary

30:34
But lets be clear, how we use that term is a legal issue

37:59
I will continue to argue that a persistent identifier, of lasting duration, for a unique registrant, is not properly pseudonymized.

39:38
I understand that LEAs and cyber researchers want to know, and if they pass a balancing test they CAN know, but trying to give them access to reverse directory info through definitional shenanigans is unworthy of our efforts

40:30
LvN goog: https://docs.google.com/document/d/156jajwvAkl1l5VsdWXpznrghkKyMUD2bhKkS20X7Xrg/edit#

51:01
Is there a difference in law between the terms legal person and legal entity in Europe?

51:37
In Germany there is none.

51:55
And do we explain these terms in our definitions?

52:16
I suspect they need clarification for a North American audience

52:46
:-)

53:34
I agree with Matthew. You are asking them to estimate legal risk and they really are not in a position to understand which individuals might be implicated across jurisdictions

54:05
( I do understand that they do this for a living, but this is a rather arcane field which they are not familiar with)

55:49
On an administrative issue: the google documents are not accessible to anyone who is not on the team, this is not the way we normally operate. Can we open those docs for viewing, to make it easier for us to share with our teams?

01:01:03
We need to make crystal clear to 2Birds that there are vast differences between a home based business and corporations and registered companie

01:01:14
No objection, but I am not sure how much it will help

01:01:26
Agree Thomas that is where I am

01:01:42
ditto

01:01:50
I don't want to stand in the way of this going forward, just skeptical of how helpful it will be

01:03:09
Do we have stats that we can provide on the breakdown of the population of legal persons (i.e. small business, registered business, corporations of various kinds)?

01:04:54
Read: they would go after ICANN since they are responsible for the policy process

01:07:38
Board is protected, Council is not

01:09:44
Agreed.

01:12:21
**Members: reminder, when using chat, please select all panelists and attendees in order for everyone to see chat.

01:13:19
As we approach the top of the hour, would the Legal Committee benefit from re-purposing the Thursday plenary to give you another 90 minutes this week? It's unclear that the plenary will have made progress on homework. It seems the legal questions are really pre-cursors for the plenary making progress.

01:14:40
Fair point Laureen, good to clarify if we are asking about something broader

01:15:52
Apologies, I have to drop for another call. Please see my question above and I'll circle back with staff.

01:19:15
Yes - forgot that one - thank you, Becky!