+1 USA

Thanks, Fabien. Yes that works from our side.

And thank you to our Japan colleague for the new text.

After "highlighting that" in the first sentence, we would like to emphasize the content that this kind of hopping continues in domain name abuse and that registrar efforts are important.And, the explanation of "Registrar Hopping" has been moved to the note.

+1 Netherlands

Good point Susan for clarity purposes.

Thans you Chris for the context!

"it is important to promote work in this area." ?

I would suggest: ´... the GAC recommends ICANN org to ensure accuracy of registration data, as well as continuous auditing of registrars by ICANN, in order to mitigate DNS abuse´

in order to make it a little bit ´stronger´

... or something similar

Agree with Susans suggestion in chat

+1 USA

ok with ICANN72 reference.

Would this suggestion be acceptable for Japan (actually, everybody): ´... the GAC recommends ICANN org to ensure accuracy of registration data, as well as continuous auditing of registrars by ICANN, in order to mitigate DNS abuse´ ?

very helpful, Jaideep 🙏🏼

Friendly reminder for GAC members to speak at a reasonable pace for interpreters to catch your remarks.

We support your suggestion, Chair.

I agreed with Paraguay

is registar hopping an abuse of domain or is another abuse? if not na abuse of domain we should write ".... type of abuse continues and…" instead of "..ttype of abuse of domain names continues"

+1 Chris

+1 Jose same as my point

registrar hopping means that regitrants transferrung the same domein names to

other registrars

thanks @Chris

We can remove specific country reference to be consistent.

english issue: the initial abuse was singular now is plural, write?

Concur, Manal.

Those types of abuse

Thank you, Kenneth. Good points.

Good edit, Kenneth. Much cleaner.

Thank you to our Japan colleague and everyone's efforts to make this text clearer.

should we remove [following] in GIs section?

Thank you for your cooperation.(JP)

thx… I feel we solved this issue

@Rosalind, is your hand an old hand please?

thank you @Rosalind

The 80 GAC members and 80 GAC Observers include both in person and virtual attendance, correct? Just double-checking, thank you.

*8 GAC Observers

... I was going to ask exactely the same question :-)

@Fabienne - small issue but on these bulleted lists (re GAC meetings; can we put an "and" in at end of the penultimate bullet; just reads easier.

@Nigel. Thanks, let me consider with the team and consider practice to date

@Fabien, thanks, not a big point; but normally when one has list; there is a ";" at end of each bulleted text and then the "and" after penultimate one

+1 USA

+1 UK

@Luisa Paez, correct.

Thank you, Gulten.

Manal, one minor editorial change under Sub Pro section text on the last sentence to read better. Suggest replacing "relative to closed generics" to "related to closed generics".

Or even cleaner text we can delete "relative" and replace by "on closed generic applications..."

some very minor, unimportant suggestions: maybe there should be a semi-colon at the end of the number bullets in the first paragraph? Also, in the second paragraph, Abuse maybe should be in small letter (instead of capital letter)

Small editing comment - Should that be continue, rather than continues?

shorter the better, I think?

[Re the 'continue' edit - it is in the penultimate sentence in the DNS abuse mitigation section]

Yes, agree

+1 UK

+ 1UK

[DNS abuse mitigation section] missing dot commas

Maybe a comma after “steward”?

I have to see the text again "Beckham"

the word encourge appears repeated in two continuous sentences

Agree Luisa

+1 Canada

encourage

Thank you all for the edits

Thanks, Kenneth!

and thanks to Manal and all for another substantive Communique 🙏🏼👍🏼👍🏼

thank you all

Thank you.

Thank you, all, for such a positive and constructive communique drafting experience.

Thank you everyone and to Manal and support staff!!

thank you all