
29:34
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.

37:42
Link here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ih_1NARViJXNNewDg-q87sQzQoC1dCtC/edit

38:07
Justine and team redlines here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS13a70f3BGx0b1gOyjvvRCoAKvxtlfO/edit

41:46
Here is the relevant recommendation that Jeff is speaking to: Recommendation 34.8: Letters of opposition to a community-based application, if any,must be considered in balance with documented support for the application.

58:55
+1 Jeff

59:08
No arguments against that @Jeff

01:00:37
noted @Justine thanks

01:02:04
thx @Jamie

01:04:14
@Justine - yes good point....we should use "documented opposition"

01:06:15
These are important distinctions @Justine thx

01:17:25
I guess my question is why do we need to distinguish between different types of non-economic communities?

01:19:55
From a non-economic grouping aspect, we focus on marginalized, minority, linguistic, cultural, ethnic groups; also traditional knowledge, and indigenous communities.

01:28:57
Which one? Sorry, missed it

01:30:07
Sorry, was looking for some 2012 AGB language. I know that the “double-counting” thing was considered, although perhaps not as effectively implemented as the WG would like to see.

01:30:30
Here: “The sequence of the criteria reflects the order in which they will be assessed by the panel. The utmost care has been taken to avoid any "double-counting" - any negative aspect found in assessing an application for one criterion should only be counted there and should not affect the assessment for other criteria.”

01:31:24
2012 AGB itself

01:34:43
+1 Jamie

01:35:50
For example, correcting Criteria #4 alone would have given .gay a score of 12

01:37:38
@Jamie+Justine +1.

01:38:45
Thank you Alan

01:39:00
ttrue - very tired

01:40:29
:-)

01:40:32
Yeah Jeff!

01:41:49
Support that cause their comments are complex

01:44:08
NEXT CALL: Thursday, 08 October 2020 at 15:00 UTC for 90 minutes.

01:44:40
considerable progress in discussion today thanks

01:44:41
Thanks all.

01:44:46
bye for now