Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.

Welcome Naveed!

I missed the poll email - I am in favor 100% also

Welcome Peter!

I also missed the poll but having worked with Heather on SSR2 Review Team i fully endorse her

I really don't think we need it in this case.

+1, Craig.

I think it's okay to put her name forward

+1

We typically give 24 hours

We could give everyone until EOD Monday?

I honesty don't think we need an extension but no objection.

Monday EOD UTC?

23:59 UTC

OK Sophie - no worries.

Staff will send a follow up email on the consensus call and deadline for item 2

@craig / @marie does that first bullet point address the earlier matter you'd raised

yes

Well, the question remains what if no candidates submit EOI after reopening of of the call

Great

Sorry Craig - not sure you meant me, I don't really have a point of concern about this.

Not at all Marie.

Hand up

There was a comment on list about having a structured form (like the fellowship one) so we can compare specifics more directly - seems logical to me.

Thanks Marie

I would suggest the structure form is required.

I would suggest that EOI reflects something around case scenarios as regards role for consideration. That might help the SSC to make good decisions.

Agree Peter - and if I could expand, there are likely standard / general questions, and then specifically curated questions that are for purpose on specific roles

Exactly

Pandemic has really eliminated one of the elements of attraction for volunteer positions, which is where there would have been travel support.

Has the SSC met in person in the past?

At ICANN meeting?

+1 Naveed

Not during my tenure, but it started near the pivot to virtual meetings

No, the SSC has not met in person

t.y. emily

For later...confused by the discussion on travel support.

ok

you get to meet more of the awesome iCANN staff :)

another perk !

Some info on STAR questions - https://www.theladders.com/career-advice/a-guide-to-the-star-method#:~:text=%20Here%20are%20examples%20of%20anecdotal%20questions%20that,project%20or%20a%20task%20at%20work%3F%20More%20

Sort of sounds like a case study assignment?

The task is of the CRG is quite specific and structured

:)

Sure thing

Hand up with one question

Ok thanks

God am sorry for being so late :-) my call at work was going on and on and on

Is staff at liberty to share how many EOIs have been received collectively across the SOs/ACs?

Thx

We can find out if that information is available

yes

I would like us to request for a second EoI

silence = no objection

I don't think we need a second EOI

I respectfully and strongly disagree.

What's the impact of opening second EOI on GNSO schedules?

+1 Jothan for the RySG...or at least many of them.

If no impact, I would be in favor of open the second call to give room for more people to apply.

We'd proceed with Heather, we'd open a process for an open call to obtain the second position EoIs

Is it true that absent 100% agreement to proceed with a second EOI that it will not happen?

I think in principle we need a new EOI if the candidate who applied isn't good enough.

But I go with the majority view

not from me.

Hand up with a little more information

no objection

Sorry Julie, would you please repeat the numbers?

2 alac

2 gac

2 for alac, 2 gac and 1 each ccNSO and gnso

Thanks Emily

Sure Sophie

Thank you Emily. So 6, which is not enough for the CRG per the ToR.

Thanks Sophie

Thank you Sophie for stepping up to chair - well done

Well done Sophie.

Thank you so much Sophie

Thanks so much Sophie!

Thanks to the awesome ICANN staff

And all

Thank you

Thanks Sophie!