Logo

051040040 New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call
Laxmi Prasad Yadav
39:33
Hello everyone
Jim Prendergast
41:56
how far in advance can we expect leadership comments to be populated in the spreadsheets? for example - we have a call Monday but I don't see any leadership comments in the document. Id like ot factor that into my preparation for the calls. thnaks
Paul McGrady
42:36
1 day in advance is tight turnaround
Julie Hedlund
42:38
Link to document: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rOqfucddhWhYK8u3-O7IHg772BpjEIGhlmCT_gMRSkQ/edit?usp=sharing
Martin Sutton
43:32
And comments can be shared on the list - like SPIRT email chain
Donna Austin
44:46
Thanks
Maxim Alzoba
48:07
sorry for being late
Maxim Alzoba
48:36
I have an update to my SOI, I stepped down from SSC RySG position.
Julie Hedlund
49:17
@Maxim: Noted.
Maxim Alzoba
49:40
@Julie , thanks
Donna Austin
50:13
In reviewing the comments, has an analysis been done where comments are similar across groups etc. or are they just reviewed individually.
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
51:03
Thanks
Martin Sutton
53:51
Hand up from Cheryl
Jim Prendergast
53:51
line 24
Paul McGrady
54:41
Reducing fees is a Pandora's Box. If ICANN can lower them for certain registries what is keeping them from raising them for others? .museum is an outlier and should stay that way.
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
55:47
I agree Paul and maybe not a conversation for this group.
Marc Trachtenberg, Greenberg Traurig, Chicago
56:02
+1 to Paul
Paul McGrady
56:34
+1 Donna. If the ICANN Board wants to favor one type of speech over another type of speech by reducing or raising its prices, I'm not sure that is something this WG wants to be involved in at all.
Marc Trachtenberg, Greenberg Traurig, Chicago
57:49
Wouldn't that be the type of content based decisions the Board has expressed concern about?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
58:49
We wanted to ensure that the comments received were well aired by the WG however
Anne Aikman-Scalese, Lewis Roca Tucson, AZ
58:54
I don't think Applicant Support assessment is content based. Isn't is more about underserved regions and slower economies in the Global South etc
Paul McGrady
59:22
@Anne - the .museum example shows it isn't.
Annebeth Lange
01:00:18
.museum was one of the so-called “sponsored” TLDs, was it not? With quite a few restrictions.
Paul McGrady
01:02:00
@Jeff - you said that the GAC reiterated its Advice. What Communique was that in? Where is it in this comment? Or, did you mean something else besides Advice?
Jim Prendergast
01:02:34
generally speaking - its best if we, the Sub Pro WG, define any terms so they are not misconstrued during implementation
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:03:26
One would think so @Jim
Paul McGrady
01:03:32
@Jeff - thanks. Sorry to be a stickler, but in ICANNland...
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:03:54
so does anyone NOT want to be clearer in definintion of the term?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:05:25
and doing it 8BY* the next call so we can discuss and decide/move on
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:05:47
*BY => *BY*
Donna Austin, GoDaddy Registry
01:08:40
thanks
Emily Barabas
01:11:18
Here is the current document we are discussing: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Pk3SadfiropKdD387FrgELdulfZuTbUCivf1SId9ZGU/edit#gid=123470843
Paul McGrady
01:14:51
"shalt"
Greg Shatan
01:15:40
Very biblical, @Paul.