Logo

ccTLD Consultation Session #2: Wednesday, 16 December 2020 | 11:30 UTC - Shared screen with speaker view
Joke Braeken
13:47
The ICANN org paper is published here as well: https://ccnso.icann.org/en/workinggroups/community-consultation-icann-public-meetings-strategic-changes-11dec20-en.pdf
Patricio Poblete
41:26
I have 3 screens, it took me a while to find where the poll window had popped up :-)
Marie-Noemie Marques
45:17
I share the same views as Katrina
Anna Karakhanyan
46:47
I also agree with Katrina.
Anna Karakhanyan
48:22
During to 2 weeks we have a lot of another meetings and it is hare to concentrate on one big meeting.
Svitlana Tkachenko
48:22
I’d prefer 1 week, 2 weeks is very exhausting, especially if there are another events.
Anna Karakhanyan
49:03
not hare-hare, typo. sorry
Peter Koch
55:29
maybe I missed the connotations of ‘must be included on the public schedule’?
Katrina Sataki
58:05
good point, Barbara
Marie-Noemie Marques
58:15
+1
Javier Rúa-Jovet
58:20
+1 !
Irina Danelia
58:22
+1
Peter Koch
01:02:34
so, are there any strings attached to being or not being ‘on the schedule’? more services, archives, other - or really only visibility (and collision detection)?
Svitlana Tkachenko
01:05:05
Irina, me too
Patricio Poblete
01:05:14
I answered “very likely”, but as a board member, I don’t really have a choice :-)
Javier Rúa-Jovet
01:05:22
that was my rationale also
Svitlana Tkachenko
01:05:59
I’m not attending, just listening
Demi Getschko
01:13:05
Thanks, Bart. Very helpful.. Have to leave now - other zoom :-( Bye all.
Barbara Povse
01:13:46
Networking is a very important part of F2F meetings, doesn’t work for me online, so I wouldn’t attend online networking events
Javier Rúa-Jovet
01:14:33
it’s very difficult online.
Joke Braeken
01:14:50
We have 2 more polls for you today.
Katrina Sataki
01:16:12
Hiderabed... yes
Katrina Sataki
01:16:21
Hiderabad, sorry, typo
Angela Matlapeng
01:16:22
interestingly I've networked online just through chats during ICANN eMeetings than I did in physical ones. I think if opportunity presents to network virtually, it'd still work. :)
Peter Koch
01:20:48
is that all so/ac in a single session?
Katrina Sataki
01:20:54
yes
Peter Koch
01:22:50
the update session could well be moved into the pre-meeting week
Katrina Sataki
01:23:47
but is it really necessary? It's like 5 minutes per SO/AC.
Irina Danelia
01:24:25
+ to Peter: or be in format of pre-ICANN report
Peter Koch
01:24:57
@katrine: not sure, there are written updates as well, but for a condensed preparation it might be helpful, at least i like to see what the AC/SA are going to deal with over the course of the week
Peter Koch
01:25:15
‘katrina’, sorry
Katrina Sataki
01:25:29
No, problem Piter ;)
Katrina Sataki
01:25:53
written update can be more effective
Irina Danelia
01:26:11
@Peter Anyway it can be done in written form
Katrina Sataki
01:26:38
I completely agree
Barbara Povse
01:32:06
I don’t see the value of regional meetings for ccTLDs - this is the role of regional organisations
Peter Koch
01:32:37
tend to agree, Barbara
Katrina Sataki
01:32:46
We have stressed this position with other SOACs and ICANN org before
Angela Matlapeng
01:32:48
my views to Barbara
Irina Danelia
01:36:22
@Barbara Does 'Regional meeting' mean that ONLY people from this region can attend? If not, I believe it is better than nothing -))
Katrina Sataki
01:36:38
No, the idea is that people from other regions are welcome too
Barbara Povse
01:36:53
Don’t know, Irina :-)
Patricio Poblete
01:37:05
In question 5, I think to would have gotten a lot more votes if it had said “3 time zones”
Marie-Noemie Marques
01:38:24
Thanks for this opportunity to contribute !
Anna Karakhanyan
01:38:34
Thank you very much and sorry-I need to leave this meeting for another one. Have a nice holidays!
Katrina Sataki
01:39:30
thank you! bye!