The ICANN org paper is published here as well: https://ccnso.icann.org/en/workinggroups/community-consultation-icann-public-meetings-strategic-changes-11dec20-en.pdf

I have 3 screens, it took me a while to find where the poll window had popped up :-)

I share the same views as Katrina

I also agree with Katrina.

During to 2 weeks we have a lot of another meetings and it is hare to concentrate on one big meeting.

I’d prefer 1 week, 2 weeks is very exhausting, especially if there are another events.

not hare-hare, typo. sorry

maybe I missed the connotations of ‘must be included on the public schedule’?

good point, Barbara

+1

+1 !

+1

so, are there any strings attached to being or not being ‘on the schedule’? more services, archives, other - or really only visibility (and collision detection)?

Irina, me too

I answered “very likely”, but as a board member, I don’t really have a choice :-)

that was my rationale also

I’m not attending, just listening

Thanks, Bart. Very helpful.. Have to leave now - other zoom :-( Bye all.

Networking is a very important part of F2F meetings, doesn’t work for me online, so I wouldn’t attend online networking events

it’s very difficult online.

We have 2 more polls for you today.

Hiderabed... yes

Hiderabad, sorry, typo

interestingly I've networked online just through chats during ICANN eMeetings than I did in physical ones. I think if opportunity presents to network virtually, it'd still work. :)

is that all so/ac in a single session?

yes

the update session could well be moved into the pre-meeting week

but is it really necessary? It's like 5 minutes per SO/AC.

+ to Peter: or be in format of pre-ICANN report

@katrine: not sure, there are written updates as well, but for a condensed preparation it might be helpful, at least i like to see what the AC/SA are going to deal with over the course of the week

‘katrina’, sorry

No, problem Piter ;)

written update can be more effective

@Peter Anyway it can be done in written form

I completely agree

I don’t see the value of regional meetings for ccTLDs - this is the role of regional organisations

tend to agree, Barbara

We have stressed this position with other SOACs and ICANN org before

my views to Barbara

@Barbara Does 'Regional meeting' mean that ONLY people from this region can attend? If not, I believe it is better than nothing -))

No, the idea is that people from other regions are welcome too

Don’t know, Irina :-)

In question 5, I think to would have gotten a lot more votes if it had said “3 time zones”

Thanks for this opportunity to contribute !

Thank you very much and sorry-I need to leave this meeting for another one. Have a nice holidays!

thank you! bye!