Jeff and I thought we would humanise the Webinar mode as much as we can

Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.

Are we still in Kuala Lumpur?

As much as we have been all along @Greg

And you will notice you get a reconnecting message as your promoted to panellist just let that run... … ...

Members: please select all panelists and attendees in order for everyone to see chat

@jim figured it was better to have slots in your calendar and cancel if needs be

ok - just in case placeholders. thanks

YUP

Go for it Paul.

Can't hear Alan

I heard his audio, ok @Anne is @Jeff coming through clear?

Jeff was very clear. Alan was in a cave

Agree - have not seen this chart of concerns and mitigation at all

I think this just brings together some of the discussions into a simple document for reference and review together

Just a rejig into a format to hopefully allow for easier reckoning SO let's just review it now

I have only just had sight of it too

Thanks Alan

Thanks @ALan hopefully that will increase your audio volume/clarity

Thanks @Greg

Good catch @Paul

Can we do a horizontal split?

or 2/3 :1/3

(if we need to reflect back onboth docs again

Transparency is Key here I think

Suggest that when staff "encounters an issue" during the implementation phase, they need to advise GNSO Council and the SPIRT of the change.

Yes to Change Log

@Cheryl, I agree. Transparency.

If it is on a wiki page then you can set to "watch the page"as desired

But yes subscribe to updates is a good add as well

COuncil could receive reports to its monthly meetings of course

as part of its overall Management of stuff processes

That was my thinking @Jeff more information re changes and note the Caagory /Action

All changes logged would be helpful, especially for review purposes and considering any course corrections in the future

Noted Justine

I like Escher however @Paul

The simple way to explain it is Standing IRT

I noted it to staff @Justine

Yup

GAC seems concerned they will have no role in the SPIRT input

SO some reassurance was and *is* required ot seems

Would be great if the GAC would appoint a SPIRT rep

@Jeff, good idea to reassure the GAC even more

Agree@

+1 Jeff - it should be in this box as well

Agree - the change log can be an oversight tool across different SO/ACs

Noted @Rubens

Good idea

A lot of churn in GAC Membership

Always difficult for newcomers and we have to take that into consideration

indeed @Annebeth

Or as an Appended Doc

I think it is useful as a supplement

And avoid all the acronyms

+1` to Annebeth's comment

+1 Annebeth

It should aid understanding

we may end up with VERY long rationale in some cases

Just be sure that it is as easy for all to understand. This is complicated, and many will feel it is easier than long explanations

AGree with "Annebeth- the chart is a good approach

we do have some packages to run throught yet

:-)\

Could you make it bigger?

No, I agree

great!

+1

Thanks!

seems a good correction

I think it is wise to do that

note to ensure cisistency

Exactly @Justine

No objection

Thanks Rubens

Yes the general rule applies

Change wording to make it clearer?

or should do

Seems to be some misunderstanding here

That was what @Justine requested Annebeth a edit in annex

Does “bearing the costs accordingly” cover this?

I dodnt think that's handled in AGB but may be in the provider rules of procedure

Yeh, sounds right

yup for me too

ok

Great

ok

fine

friendly amendment @Justine??

so we can be explicite here

A good change to make it clearer

Good point @Jamie we need to address that timing point

+1 Jamie

+1 Jamie. It might be necessary to discuss it once more in the WG?

in so far as it does not delay the commencement of CPE

Can we ask for some qualifiers for this and come back to it for review at a next weeks call then? Noting the TIME

@Cheryl, agree

NEXT CALL:Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:00 UTC for 90 minutes.

RE private resolution of contention sets, apparently 90% were resolved before auctions of last resort. So 90% private resolution

Bye for now! Thank you for an interesting session.

Thanks everyone GREAT progress again today Stay SAFE make SMART Choices

Bye for now

Thank you