Logo

New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG call - Shared screen with speaker view
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
30:59
Jeff and I thought we would humanise the Webinar mode as much as we can
Julie Bisland
31:13
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.
Greg Shatan
31:16
Are we still in Kuala Lumpur?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
31:40
As much as we have been all along @Greg
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
32:42
And you will notice you get a reconnecting message as your promoted to panellist just let that run... … ...
Julie Bisland
33:05
Members: please select all panelists and attendees in order for everyone to see chat
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
33:29
@jim figured it was better to have slots in your calendar and cancel if needs be
Jim Prendergast
33:30
ok - just in case placeholders. thanks
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
33:39
YUP
Jim Prendergast
35:12
Go for it Paul.
Anne Aikman-Scalese
38:18
Can't hear Alan
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
38:53
I heard his audio, ok @Anne is @Jeff coming through clear?
Anne Aikman-Scalese
39:21
Jeff was very clear. Alan was in a cave
Anne Aikman-Scalese
40:04
Agree - have not seen this chart of concerns and mitigation at all
Martin Sutton
40:51
I think this just brings together some of the discussions into a simple document for reference and review together
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
41:03
Just a rejig into a format to hopefully allow for easier reckoning SO let's just review it now
Martin Sutton
41:04
I have only just had sight of it too
Anne Aikman-Scalese
41:54
Thanks Alan
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
42:10
Thanks @ALan hopefully that will increase your audio volume/clarity
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
42:31
Thanks @Greg
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
43:43
Good catch @Paul
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
49:40
Can we do a horizontal split?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
49:56
or 2/3 :1/3
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
50:34
(if we need to reflect back onboth docs again
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
52:54
Transparency is Key here I think
Anne Aikman-Scalese
56:48
Suggest that when staff "encounters an issue" during the implementation phase, they need to advise GNSO Council and the SPIRT of the change.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:00:30
Yes to Change Log
Annebeth Lange
01:00:43
@Cheryl, I agree. Transparency.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:01:02
If it is on a wiki page then you can set to "watch the page"as desired
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:01:25
But yes subscribe to updates is a good add as well
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:01:50
COuncil could receive reports to its monthly meetings of course
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:02:16
as part of its overall Management of stuff processes
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:08:16
That was my thinking @Jeff more information re changes and note the Caagory /Action
Martin Sutton
01:09:15
All changes logged would be helpful, especially for review purposes and considering any course corrections in the future
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:09:49
Noted Justine
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:11:45
I like Escher however @Paul
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:11:55
The simple way to explain it is Standing IRT
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:11:56
I noted it to staff @Justine
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:12:24
Yup
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:13:31
GAC seems concerned they will have no role in the SPIRT input
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:13:59
SO some reassurance was and *is* required ot seems
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:14:06
Would be great if the GAC would appoint a SPIRT rep
Annebeth Lange
01:14:42
@Jeff, good idea to reassure the GAC even more
Annebeth Lange
01:17:01
Agree@
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:17:07
+1 Jeff - it should be in this box as well
Martin Sutton
01:20:33
Agree - the change log can be an oversight tool across different SO/ACs
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:20:49
Noted @Rubens
Annebeth Lange
01:20:55
Good idea
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:21:37
A lot of churn in GAC Membership
Annebeth Lange
01:22:36
Always difficult for newcomers and we have to take that into consideration
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:22:50
indeed @Annebeth
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:23:22
Or as an Appended Doc
Annebeth Lange
01:23:37
I think it is useful as a supplement
Annebeth Lange
01:23:53
And avoid all the acronyms
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:23:56
+1` to Annebeth's comment
Martin Sutton
01:24:02
+1 Annebeth
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:24:18
It should aid understanding
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:26:20
we may end up with VERY long rationale in some cases
Annebeth Lange
01:26:44
Just be sure that it is as easy for all to understand. This is complicated, and many will feel it is easier than long explanations
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:27:26
AGree with "Annebeth- the chart is a good approach
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:27:38
we do have some packages to run throught yet
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:27:53
:-)\
Annebeth Lange
01:28:47
Could you make it bigger?
Annebeth Lange
01:31:46
No, I agree
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:32:02
great!
Annebeth Lange
01:33:02
+1
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:33:04
Thanks!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:34:22
seems a good correction
Annebeth Lange
01:34:31
I think it is wise to do that
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:35:11
note to ensure cisistency
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:42:22
Exactly @Justine
Annebeth Lange
01:42:31
No objection
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:44:04
Thanks Rubens
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:44:39
Yes the general rule applies
Annebeth Lange
01:44:43
Change wording to make it clearer?
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:44:47
or should do
Annebeth Lange
01:45:03
Seems to be some misunderstanding here
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:45:29
That was what @Justine requested Annebeth a edit in annex
Annebeth Lange
01:48:46
Does “bearing the costs accordingly” cover this?
Jim Prendergast
01:49:07
I dodnt think that's handled in AGB but may be in the provider rules of procedure
Annebeth Lange
01:49:08
Yeh, sounds right
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:49:12
yup for me too
Katrin Ohlmer
01:50:50
ok
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:50:58
Great
Annebeth Lange
01:50:59
ok
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:51:00
fine
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:53:29
friendly amendment @Justine??
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:54:18
so we can be explicite here
Annebeth Lange
01:54:49
A good change to make it clearer
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:55:16
Good point @Jamie we need to address that timing point
Katrin Ohlmer
01:55:48
+1 Jamie
Annebeth Lange
01:56:11
+1 Jamie. It might be necessary to discuss it once more in the WG?
Jamie Baxter
01:56:25
in so far as it does not delay the commencement of CPE
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:56:35
Can we ask for some qualifiers for this and come back to it for review at a next weeks call then? Noting the TIME
Annebeth Lange
01:56:52
@Cheryl, agree
Julie Bisland
01:57:56
NEXT CALL:Monday, 29 June 2020 at 15:00 UTC for 90 minutes.
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:58:19
RE private resolution of contention sets, apparently 90% were resolved before auctions of last resort. So 90% private resolution
Annebeth Lange
01:58:38
Bye for now! Thank you for an interesting session.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:58:40
Thanks everyone GREAT progress again today Stay SAFE make SMART Choices
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
01:58:48
Bye for now
Anne Aikman-Scalese
01:58:48
Thank you