Logo

Julie Bisland's Personal Meeting Room - Shared screen with speaker view
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
30:51
I agree that more specificity is required
Margie Milam (BC)
31:07
yes
Margie Milam (BC)
31:11
i'll do it on email
Brian King (IPC)
31:18
I raised my hand to agree that we should ask the question about the registrant
Brian King (IPC)
31:20
Thanks
Berry Cobb
32:12
7 Jan 2020
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
33:45
really? I thought that was clear as crystal
Margie Milam (BC)
38:22
seems ok
Becky Burr (chair)
39:14
Thanks Volker for the last one
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
45:42
gladly
Brian King (IPC)
48:12
I think that parenthetical would be helpful
Becky Burr (chair)
48:37
Controllers (e.g., ICANN’s interest in maintaining the security and stability of the Internet’s unique identifiers)
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
49:24
What is missing is ICANN's commitment (interest) to make the data available to third parties in order to maintain the security, stability and resiliency of the DNS
Volker Greimann
49:29
referring to the controller is sufficient
Becky Burr (chair)
50:13
That is the way I read the question Matt and Volker, I.e., the interest of the controller is assumed.
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
51:37
+1 Becky
Margie Milam (BC)
51:38
that's helpful
Brian King (IPC)
51:44
Yes please
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
52:36
ICANN has this interest regardless whether it is a controller or not
Brian King (IPC)
53:22
No objection
Margie Milam (BC)
53:52
that works
Brian King (IPC)
54:01
and/or gives us more wiggle room
Caitlin Tubergen
58:25
Here is what I captured from Brian: - Would detailed notice at the time of registration and ongoing renewals reduce the risk to a negligible level?
Brian King (IPC)
59:15
"the risk that data subjects will wrongly self-identify" in place of "the risk" would make a good addition. Thank you, Caitlin!
Tara Whalen (SSAC)
59:20
Thanks! I was just about to ask.
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:02:37
I am not a big fan of the "others are doing it wrong too" legal defense.
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
01:02:53
+1 to the SSAC question - this is not tackled through the previous related question
Tara Whalen (SSAC)
01:02:55
Yes, that is it exactly, Becky.
Margie Milam (BC)
01:04:11
+1 to the SSAC question
Tara Whalen (SSAC)
01:05:16
The specific examples are for illustration, more so than “this is fine.”
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:07:11
Dan +1
Caitlin Tubergen
01:07:14
Going to put the question in the screen in a more viewable fashion.
Brian King (IPC)
01:07:49
I've always thought the RIPE/ARIN approach was worth our studying. I'd support asking B&B to review it with us in mind.
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:10:40
"Hey look: they just gave us hours of billable hours just to read stuff!"
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
01:11:48
+1 Becky & Tara
Brian King (IPC)
01:11:53
I'd be curious to know if consent is the only legal basis that RIPE/ARIN are relying on
Laureen Kapin (GAC)
01:13:30
I will look at the GAC questions in light of the updated accuracy and legal natural questions.
Caitlin Tubergen
01:14:23
Certainly, Becky - will do!
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:15:41
apart from the fact that the answer to Otco question 1 is "the latter"...
Becky Burr (chair)
01:16:18
@Volker, your point is that an additional research purpose is required?
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:16:34
yes. I't bet on that
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:16:58
@Brian: all of the above
Matthew Crossman (RySG)
01:19:32
I think that is a fair approach
Margie Milam (BC)
01:19:52
+1 Brian
Thomas Rickert (ISPCP)
01:20:27
We have spent a lot of time speculating what OCTO might want. I think it is for OCTO and OCTO only to speak up and share their requirements.
Brian King (IPC)
01:20:35
Thanks, Becky. Nor did I, just wanted to note that "are you now" is an incomplete question.
Margie Milam (BC)
01:20:37
+1 - on hold
Thomas Rickert (ISPCP)
01:20:51
Yep, put it on hold
Brian King (IPC)
01:21:11
Unfortunately I need to drop now. Apologies.
Brian King (IPC)
01:21:33
Please don't assign me too much homework while I'm gone, though I'm happy to take some.
Brian King (IPC)
01:21:40
Thanks, all.
Caitlin Tubergen
01:23:32
Will do, Becky - thank you
Laureen Kapin (GAC)
01:23:39
Thanks Becky and Caitlin -- I will take a look.
Caitlin Tubergen
01:26:12
Got it - thank you!
Matthew Crossman (RySG)
01:26:18
Sounds good
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
01:26:31
ok good
Terri Agnew
01:26:34
**EPDP F2F 27, 28, 29 Jan in LA
Berry Cobb
01:27:16
we will also have one more meeting for 21 Jan 2020. If required.
Matthew Crossman (RySG)
01:27:32
Thanks everyone, happy holidays to those celebrating
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
01:27:46
happy holidays all - bye for now
Tatiana Tropina (NCSG)
01:27:48
thanks all - happy holidays!