
26:11
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.

30:16
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xMehg9o44bdz85ry0LJvhzoOaKdmJ6SwIrLneMx0Ixc/edit#gid=850894509

35:32
Agree to refer it up David

37:57
I was knocked offline for a minute. Did we decide to do anything in response to the answers to Sunrise Q5?

38:35
Ariel, I don't know if it's just my screen, but the spreadsheet is not displaying properly. Some of the text boxes are cutting off the text, and I cannot change it at my end. Would you mind looking at this please

39:16
Hi Susan - it is displaying for me properly but will check again

39:30
(Audio cutting in and out (perhaps just on my end?))

40:09
it's displaying ok here too

40:09
Thanks....we can decide later whether to recommend any particular approach to non-English languages and the TMCH.

40:11
for me too

42:47
Phone is really clear

42:52
Sounds clear

47:19
The IRT should be able to consult with a wide variety of outside groups, both in views on trademark policy as well as expertise in clear communications. We can tweak recommendation to that effect.

47:56
We can tweak at full WG level

48:42
Yes, and thanks to Susan

48:55
Hand up

50:41
Thanks David

51:46
Registrar will just wait the 90 day period and then provide registration services

53:29
Thanks for clarification.

53:56
Then shouldn't the non-participating registrar be sending a different message?

55:02
@Phil probably

55:03
@Phil - I think it would be preferable

57:02
Seems like this might be an issue to be hashed out between new gTLDs and registrars that don't do sunrise

57:21
+1 Phil

59:22
Current wording: TheClaims Notice MUST be provided by the registrar to thepotential domain name registrant in English and SHOULDbe provided by the registrar to the potential domain nameregistrant in the language of the registration agreement.

01:01:34
sorry

01:01:37
Hand up

01:03:02
Thanks David

01:04:58
I think BC may have misunderstood the recommendation -- six UN languages are for ICANN website, not notice to registrant

01:05:01
@Michael, I understood BC differently, as David did

01:05:13
Fair enough

01:05:24
Possible I’m misunderstanding the thrust of the comment

01:06:57
On #3, IPC and INTA comments are similar re IRT. Can anyone recall whether these are new ideas?

01:08:31
Thanks Roger

01:13:27
Will do

01:16:05
+1 David

01:18:11
hand up

01:19:02
I think we get to Brands again in the question to follow

01:20:54
How many recommendations and questions are left?

01:20:59
4 more

01:21:20
So we should be able to wrap up next week. Great

01:21:51
thanks again David

01:21:57
Thank you David and all!

01:21:58
Thanks

01:22:01
Bye all