Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xMehg9o44bdz85ry0LJvhzoOaKdmJ6SwIrLneMx0Ixc/edit#gid=850894509

Agree to refer it up David

I was knocked offline for a minute. Did we decide to do anything in response to the answers to Sunrise Q5?

Ariel, I don't know if it's just my screen, but the spreadsheet is not displaying properly. Some of the text boxes are cutting off the text, and I cannot change it at my end. Would you mind looking at this please

Hi Susan - it is displaying for me properly but will check again

(Audio cutting in and out (perhaps just on my end?))

it's displaying ok here too

Thanks....we can decide later whether to recommend any particular approach to non-English languages and the TMCH.

for me too

Phone is really clear

Sounds clear

The IRT should be able to consult with a wide variety of outside groups, both in views on trademark policy as well as expertise in clear communications. We can tweak recommendation to that effect.

We can tweak at full WG level

Yes, and thanks to Susan

Hand up

Thanks David

Registrar will just wait the 90 day period and then provide registration services

Thanks for clarification.

Then shouldn't the non-participating registrar be sending a different message?

@Phil probably

@Phil - I think it would be preferable

Seems like this might be an issue to be hashed out between new gTLDs and registrars that don't do sunrise

+1 Phil

Current wording: TheClaims Notice MUST be provided by the registrar to thepotential domain name registrant in English and SHOULDbe provided by the registrar to the potential domain nameregistrant in the language of the registration agreement.

sorry

Hand up

Thanks David

I think BC may have misunderstood the recommendation -- six UN languages are for ICANN website, not notice to registrant

@Michael, I understood BC differently, as David did

Fair enough

Possible I’m misunderstanding the thrust of the comment

On #3, IPC and INTA comments are similar re IRT. Can anyone recall whether these are new ideas?

Thanks Roger

Will do

+1 David

hand up

I think we get to Brands again in the question to follow

How many recommendations and questions are left?

4 more

So we should be able to wrap up next week. Great

thanks again David

Thank you David and all!

Thanks

Bye all