Logo

051040043 - EPDP-Phase 2 Team Call - Shared screen with speaker view
Thomas Rickert (ISPCP)
30:54
hi all!
Terri Agnew
32:55
Please review ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en.
Amr Elsadr (NCSG)
36:22
@Xavier: Shouldn’t WE be thanking YOU?! :-)
Thomas Rickert (ISPCP)
42:51
yes
Amr Elsadr (NCSG)
45:04
The 3 months are to test integration with Contracted Party systems?
Amr Elsadr (NCSG)
45:23
Thanks, Xavier. Very much appreciated.
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
48:42
maybe we should just ask the requesters what they would be willing to pay per request and then build our model from that estimated maximum budget
Matt Serlin (RrSG)
53:11
Based on these assumptions, does ICANN believe it has any providers under contract today who would be able to provide any of these various services?
Margie Milam (BC)
57:27
Also - has ICANN evaluated any of the systems being developed by others (PWC, WIPO/Info Networks)
Matt Serlin (RrSG)
58:16
Will RFP’s be issued for each element of the system?
Georgios Tselentis (GAC)
59:00
What is your assumption about the time that the authentication and identification is valid?
Matt Serlin (RrSG)
01:06:35
Will the questions we submitted be addressed? I believe at least the RrSG and RySG did that…
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:08:51
Indeed. NCSG was counting on you guys asking all the good questions...
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
01:11:36
2.1.2 speaks about the development of the central gateway and the accreditation system - my understanding the cost estimate did not include any estimates in relation to CPs systems development and operation
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:18:59
Given the potential for abuse of the system by accredited entities, particularly given the pressure for automated response. The closer the accreditor is to the metrics, the better.
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:19:56
This can of course be done via a feed from the other entity. However, given the different incentives that arise from having two separate entities, it is one more risk to manage.
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:20:17
Presumably the operator gets paid based on volumes, in part at least
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:21:14
Speaking of risks. When do you plan to do a risk assessment on this thing? Hopefully not after it is built....
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:23:56
I would think that the risk assessment should follow the PIA, once that is done.
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:24:04
Better late than never, re the PIA.
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:24:44
The PIA will test all the assumptions made in the proposed policy, prior to spending the money to build it....
Amr Elsadr (NCSG)
01:27:04
@Stephanie: +1
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:28:59
Please do. A PIA will show you some of the risks, but there are really quite a few....
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:29:06
Unrelated to privacy
Volker Greimann (RrSG)
01:32:28
maybe Facebook will build it for free.
Marc Anderson (RySG)
01:42:42
Thanks Xavier - great point on signed assertions
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
01:45:33
@Aaron indeed it is specific to both request and requestor
Amr Elsadr (NCSG)
01:48:52
Everything now is clear, or we now know what isn’t so clear? :-)
Amr Elsadr (NCSG)
01:49:34
@Xavier @Francisco @Aaron: Thanks for being on this call with us today.
Marc Anderson (RySG)
01:49:59
+1 - thank you Xavier, Francisco and Aarom
Matt Serlin (RrSG)
01:50:13
Thanks all
Thomas Rickert (ISPCP)
01:50:13
Thanks to Xavier, Francisco and Aaron!
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG)
01:50:14
Yes thanks very much!
Hadia Elminiawi (ALAC)
01:50:20
Thank you bye