Logo

051040040 RPMs in all gTLDS PDP WG
David McAuley (Verisign)
35:15
Thanks - listening on computer audio and will speak, if needed, on phone
David McAuley (Verisign)
36:54
Staff will help with this
David McAuley (Verisign)
37:15
Thank you Julie
Julie Hedlund
39:24
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10mftuhNy7YMgtCIu2ZRwsCleDgbP8AAAFz_jMHBFL70/edit#
Ariel Liang
39:24
This is the analysis doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10mftuhNy7YMgtCIu2ZRwsCleDgbP8AAAFz_jMHBFL70/edit#
David McAuley (Verisign)
39:30
I can see it
Marie Pattullo
40:23
I can too.
David McAuley (Verisign)
40:28
and I still see it
Paul Tattersfield
40:32
I can too
David McAuley (Verisign)
46:11
agreed and Q 2 relates
Paul McGrady
49:46
Zoom is quirky today...
David McAuley (Verisign)
51:38
I think we have seen some full WG requests for such a rec Phil
David McAuley (Verisign)
51:56
That's right we passed that along from Sub A
Ariel Liang
51:56
Hand up
David McAuley (Verisign)
53:53
Thanks Ariel -
Ariel Liang
54:19
np
Paul McGrady
54:41
Agree with Phil.
David McAuley (Verisign)
54:47
Thanks Phil, that appears consistent with discussion as I recall
Susan.Payne
54:54
agree Phil
Greg Shatan (ISOC-NY)
55:01
Support
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:00:14
Sub A agreed to keep Rec 6 as is and noted for full WG some comments where there was request to consider ‘marks contained’ variation but the subgroup passed this along as is
Cyntia King (USA)
01:09:58
No
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:10:21
can I get phone unmuted there and I will unmute here
Ariel Liang
01:10:45
Paul’s proposal: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2020-August/004417.html
Maxim Alzoba
01:13:12
who is going to decide what is fair?
Maxim Alzoba
01:14:55
so example with police.city will be a subject to such DRP? (city might have it at lower price than all sunrise registrations
Maxim Alzoba
01:15:23
and for example 5 USD for city are lower than 60USD for sunrise
Susan.Payne
01:17:38
I can't speak for Paul maxim, but I think police.eyewear or police.specatacles would be captured and policy.city would probably not
Susan.Payne
01:18:59
sorry! police.city
Maxim Alzoba
01:19:14
then it should be in the proposal
Susan.Payne
01:20:06
I think that is covered in safeguard bullet 3
Ariel Liang
01:22:22
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/pddrp-04jun12-en.pdf
Maxim Alzoba
01:27:16
yes
Maxim Alzoba
01:34:13
for example - higher price is formally a +1 USD higher price , and since the panel goes for a formal review - it is a bad idea
Rebecca Tushnet
01:37:42
I agree with the concern about eliminating the "or." Right now "unfair advantage" is constrained by the requirement of infringing registrations, but the proposal eliminates that constraint and leaves only the open ended "unfair."
Maxim Alzoba
01:38:05
the last bullet - is loaded, the second part. if the policy or procedure is breached, there are mechanisms to enforce it
Maxim Alzoba
01:38:41
there are no undermining , it is either policy compliant behaviour, or not
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:39:54
was a concern of mine, yes
Scott Austin
01:41:07
@Susan +1
Maxim Alzoba
01:43:55
also Registries are prohibited from using TMCH - how do they know what is TM or not?
Brian beckham
01:43:59
agree with what Greg says re a singular example; the PDDRP is geared towards systemic issues
Paul McGrady
01:44:00
Correct Greg! The TM-PDDRP has a pattern/practice component baked into it. This is not for one-off events.
Maxim Alzoba
01:45:11
I will
Scott Austin
01:45:22
With focus and wordsmithing in small group they should have the opportunity to address the issues raised on the call by David and Maxim today. The need to address the issue merits that opportunity
Marie Pattullo
01:46:13
It's certainly a great start - thanks Paul. While I support it, I would also support it being given to a small group to finesse it.
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:49:38
I will volunteer for this small team as well
Susan.Payne
01:49:55
me too
Greg Shatan (ISOC-NY)
01:50:17
me three
Zak Muscovitch
01:50:29
I'll join as well
Julie Hedlund
01:50:33
Thanks David, Susan, and Greg!
Julie Hedlund
01:50:36
and Zak
Paul McGrady
01:50:45
Thanks Phil!
Julie Hedlund
01:50:58
That concludes the agenda for the day
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:51:21
Special thanks to staff today from me for help reading Sub A materials
Julie Bisland
01:51:23
Next call: Thursday, 20 August 2020 at 17:00 UTC for 90 minutes.
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:52:02
I will send apologies now for Thursday's call - on the road home
David McAuley (Verisign)
01:52:31
Thanks Phil and all
Maxim Alzoba
01:52:45
bye all